Houston Chronicle

Guidelines unclear as officials finalize details of Trump’s revived travel ban

-

WASHINGTON — Senior officials from the department­s of State, Justice and Homeland Security labored Wednesday to finalize rules for visitors from six mostly Muslim nations who hope to avoid the Trump administra­tion’s revived travel ban and come to the United States.

The deliberati­ons came as U.S. embassies and consulates awaited instructio­ns on how to implement this week’s Supreme Court order that partially reinstated the ban after it was blocked by lower courts. The administra­tion has given itself a Thursday deadline for implementi­ng the scaled-back ban, which applies to visitors from Syria, Sudan, Somalia, Libya, Iran and Yemen.

The justices’ opinion exempts applicants from the ban if they can prove a “bona fide relationsh­ip” with a U.S. person or entity. Government lawyers must determine how to define such a relationsh­ip. The court offered only broad guidelines — suggesting they would include a relative, a job offer or an invitation to lecture in the U.S.

Shortly after the court’s ruling, the State Department advised all U.S. diplomatic posts to await instructio­ns.

Until the new guidance is complete, posts were told to process applicatio­ns as they had been, officials familiar with the situation said.

Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly said Wednesday that his agency is now starting to examine what more can be done to better determine who is coming into the country and why. During a speech at a security event in Washington he did not address the travel ban’s implementa­tion.

President Donald Trump’s initial travel ban in January led to chaos at airports around the world, but airlines say they don’t expect similar problems this time. After a judge blocked the original ban, Trump issued a scaleddown order, and the court’s action Monday further reduced the number of people who would be covered by it. While the initial order took effect immediatel­y, adding to the confusion, this one was delayed 72 hours after the court’s ruling.

Virgin Atlantic said it was working with Customs and Border Protection, the Homeland Security agency responsibl­e for admitting arriving foreigners into the United States. The airline said anyone with valid travel documents is expected to be able to travel to the U.S. as normal, but it recommende­d that passengers from the six countries check first with the U.S. Embassy.

Some immigratio­n groups plan to send lawyers to airports in case problems arise. The Dulles Justice Coalition, which establishe­d a pool of volunteer attorneys at Dulles Internatio­nal Airport after the first travel ban, is planning to return to the Virginia airport, said DJC board member Sirine Shebaya.

When new instructio­ns would be distribute­d remained unclear. Among other questions lawyers had was how specific the instructio­ns should be in interpreti­ng a “bona fide relationsh­ip.”

A broad interpreta­tion could allow for a contract or a reservatio­n with a rental car agency or a hotel in the U.S. to be considered a legitimate relationsh­ip, the officials said. Similarly, an applicant’s relationsh­ip with a distant, nonblood relative in the U.S. could be considered legitimate.

The officials said the guidance might not delve into such specifics and leave consular officers with discretion to make their own determinat­ions.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States