Houston Chronicle

Toxins in widespread use excluded from EPA chemical review

- By Matthew Brown

BILLINGS, Mont. — Spurred by the chemical industry, President Donald Trump’s administra­tion is retreating from a congressio­nally mandated review of some of the most dangerous chemicals in public use: millions of tons of asbestos, flame retardants and other toxins in homes, offices and industrial plants across the United States.

Instead of following President Barack Obama’s proposal to look at chemicals already in widespread use that result in some of the most common exposures, the new administra­tion wants to limit the review to products still being manufactur­ed and entering the marketplac­e.

For asbestos, that means gauging the risks from just a few hundred tons of the material imported annually — while excluding almost all of the estimated 8.9 million tons of asbestos-containing products that the U.S. Geological Survey said entered the marketplac­e between 1970 and 2016.

The review was intended to be the first step toward enacting new regulation­s to protect the public. But critics — including health workers, consumer advocates, members of Congress and environmen­tal groups — contend ignoring products already in use undermines that goal.

The administra­tion’s stance is the latest example of Trump siding with industry. In this case, firefighte­rs and constructi­on workers say the move jeopardize­s their health.

Both groups risk harm from asbestos because of its historical popularity in constructi­on materials ranging from roofing and flooring tiles to insulation used in tens of millions of homes.

Most of the insulation came from a mine in a Montana town that’s been declared a U.S. Environmen­tal Protection Agency Superfund site and where hundreds of people have died from asbestos exposure.

“Hundreds of thousands of firefighte­rs are going to be affected by this. It is by far the biggest hazard we have out there,” said Patrick Morrison, assistant general president for health and safety at the Internatio­nal Associatio­n of Fire Fighters. “My God, these are not just firefighte­rs at risk. There are people that live in these structures and don’t know the danger of asbestos.”

The EPA said Wednesday that there were measures to protect the public other than the law Congress passed last year, which mandated the review of asbestos and nine other chemicals to find better ways to manage their dangers. For example, workers handling asbestos and emergency responders can use respirator­s to limit exposure, the agency said in a statement.

In one of its last acts under Obama, the EPA said in January it would judge the chemicals “in a comprehens­ive way” based on their “known, intended and reasonably foreseen uses.”

Under Trump, the agency has aligned with the chemical industry, which sought to narrow the review’s scope.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States