Houston Chronicle

Placing the plight of Haiti where it truly belongs

- By Sir Ronald Sanders Sanders is Antigua and Barbuda’s ambassador to the United States and the Organizati­on of American States.

The effect of the inappropri­ate depiction of Haiti, El Salvador and all African nations as “s---hole” countries is a matter that the people of the United States and their government and Congress should contemplat­e seriously.

The responses have been swift, showing a mixture of outrage and shock. There has been no expression of regret about the comment that has done nothing but injure the relations between the United States and many countries. Hopefully, representa­tives of the United States in other countries will distance themselves from it, and apologize as discreetly as they can.

I am here concerned particular­ly with the remarks about Haiti, a member state of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) and the current chair of the group’s Heads of Government caucus. My colleague, the ambassador of Haiti to the United States, Paul Altidor, rightly said, “We feel in the statements, if they were made, the president was either misinforme­d or miseducate­d about Haiti and its people.” The United Nations spokesman Rupert Colville, described the remarks as “racist.”

Haiti, for us in the Caribbean, is more than just a member of our community. It was the first nation to rise up against slavery and oppression in our region. When the Republic of Haiti was establishe­d on Jan. 1, 1804, it was the first free nation of free black people to rise in a world of empires of Western European nations.

And Haiti paid a very high price for its assertion that black people were born free, entitled to freedom and the right to fight for it.

In a real sense, from the moment of that assertion of freedom, Haiti was earmarked for the “s---hole” status now applied to it. It was punished by every European nation, particular­ly France, and successive government­s of the United States aided and abetted in the process.

France demanded huge reparation­s for the slaves and plantation­s it lost at the revolt of Toussaint L’Ouverture. In 1825, Haiti’s leaders were forced to agree to pay France the harsh levy of 90 million gold francs, which the country did not finish repaying until 1947.

For almost a hundred years, Haiti was pushed into poverty by the French demand, upheld by Western European nations and the United States. Indeed, the United States, which continued to be a slave-owning nation after European nations outlawed it, did not recognize Haiti as a free nation until 1862. But even that recognitio­n was meaningles­s. Taking advantage of Haiti’s lack of capacity to defend itself from external interventi­on, U.S. naval ships entered Haitian waters no less than 24 times between 1849 and 1913, ostensibly “to protect American lives and property.” Finally, in 1915, the U.S. invaded Haiti and ruled the country as an occupying force for 20 years.

During that period, Haiti and the Haitian people, already impoverish­ed, exploited and isolated by what was then the internatio­nal community — Western European nations and the United States — were further disadvanta­ged. Its constituti­on was rewritten against its will, something the U.S. State Department admitted in 1927. Under that constituti­on, laws preventing foreigners from owning land were scrapped, allowing U.S. companies to take what they wanted.

In 1926, a New York business publicatio­n described Haiti as “a marvellous opportunit­y” for U.S. investment, stating that “the run of the mill Haitian is handy, easily directed, and gives a hard day’s labour for 20 cents, while in Panama the same day’s work cost $3.” U.S. corporatio­ns grew from 13 in 1966 to 154 in 1981, enriching themselves, pauperizin­g the Haitian people even more and doing little to add wealth to the economy.

The Haitians have also suffered from government­s that suited foreign powers being put into office, only to be removed if their policies ceased to serve the interest of those foreign powers.

Therefore, democracy in Haiti was emasculate­d not by the Haitian people, but by external forces and Haitian elites that they suborned.

Incidental­ly, the United States has had a balance of trade surpluses with Haiti for many decades. For instance the 11 months, ending November 30, 2017, the surplus in favor of the United States was $385 million. So, for a “s---hole” country it has provided annual revenues and employment to the United States of some magnitude.

Sadly, from this entire experience, Haiti is the poorest country in all the Americas. But it is far from a “s---hole,” possessing as it does some of the most beautiful landscapes and seascapes in the Caribbean, a remarkably talented and creative people and hard workers.

Of Haiti’s population of 10.4 million people, only 500,000 have permanent employment. Yet, the Haitian people maintain stability in a continuing struggle.

If Haiti is a “s---hole,” those who made it so should acknowledg­e their devastatin­g role, and in their shame, they should pledge to do better.

Every Caribbean person, at all levels, should make it abundantly and crystal clear that we resent this depiction of Haiti. We call for acknowledg­ement by all who have exploited it and kept it in poverty, and we urge that instead of dismissing it in unfortunat­e language, they implement programs to atone for their part in its pauperizat­ion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States