Houston Chronicle

Catch as catch can, except with Goodell’s NFL rules

- BRIAN T. SMITH Commentary

It is the most pressing problem staring the NFL in the face as Super Bowl LII awaits.

And for a $14 billion league struggling with concussion­s and player safety, national anthem protests and declining TV ratings, it’s become the billiondol­lar question. What is a catch? Like, seriously. What in the world constitute­s a catch in pro football nowadays?

You’ve known the answer your entire life. At least you thought you did. Then the last decade appeared, forcing you to mentally bobble everything ev-

ery time a receiver hit the ground and the ball briefly bounced around.

I probably learned the incredibly complex and multi-layered rules governing a catch — “Did the player catch the ball? Yes? Then, that’s a catch.” — when I was 3, maybe 4. Almost 36 years later, I’m more confused than ever and I know I’m far from the only one.

Heck, even the King of the league has no idea what we’re seeing or talking about anymore.

“Clearly catch, no-catch has been a lot of discussion and a lot of disagreeme­nt,” NFL commission­er Roger Goodell said this week, during his annual chat with the Super Bowl media. “I think we can clarify this rule and I think we can do it with a lot of hard work (and) focus and get to a place where — I’m not going to tell you there won’t be controvers­y, but I believe we can get to a much better place.”

Replay part of problem A much better place. About a catch. In 2018. Wowzers. There’s no specific point in time when it became so bad there was no going back. If you’re older than me, you’ve been yelling at the TV for decades, and I’ve been shouting out the obvious at the screen since I was in my early teens.

But ever since the referees on the field began being controlled by the NFL overlords in a game-day operations headquarte­rs in New York — it sounds like something out of a bad science fiction show, I know — pro football has lost its sight and senses.

Common sense: Out the window.

The over-analysis of everything: Increasing­ly in vogue in the NFL, while being hated more than ever by the paying masses.

Clear touchdowns are suddenly erased. Heroic midfield grabs disappear. Simple quarter-back-to-wide receiver connection­s become a crime scene, replayed over and over and over on your TV, as the game ceases and a couple of announcers dance around a question that no one has a consistent answer to anymore. What is a catch? “From our standpoint, I would like to start back, instead of adding to the rule, subtractin­g the rule,” Goodell said. “Start over again and look at the rule fundamenta­lly from the start. Because I think when you add or subtract things you can still lead to confusion. These rules are very complex — you have to look at what the unintended consequenc­es are of making a change, which is what the Competitio­n Committee, in my view, does so well and with so much thought.”

At least the King is talking — that’s a start. But there’s nothing in NFL history or our understand­ing of football that says a catch — and answering questions about it — must be this complex.

Twisted language “Survive the ground.” I mean, what is that? Who speaks like that? How do you even “survive” the ground?

The Cowboys were wronged. The Steelers were tortured. The Lions haven’t recovered from Calvin Johnson’s TD (that was ruled a non-TD) — he retired and Detroit hasn’t been to a Super Bowl.

A smart prop bet: Will the NFL screw up the catch rule in Super Bowl LII?

“I do think that if it’s a catch in the backyard, in high school, in college and then all of a sudden you get to the NFL and it’s not a catch, there’s something that we have to look at there,” Texans coach Bill O’Brien said in December, sounding like a modern football genius.

The NFL is in the cross hairs. The league rakes in endless cash — Fox is paying $3.3 billion for the rights to televise the weekly snoozefest that is “Thursday Night Foot- ball” — but fan frustratio­n is through the roof and it’s impossible to talk about pro football without complainin­g about it.

The games are too slow and long. The on-field quality has declined. The sport is brutal — but it’s also too easy for QBs to pass. Kids are choosing safer sporting options — even Justin Timberlake won’t let his child play.

Refs, flags and TV timeouts drag down a pro game that could learn a lot from college football.

And then there’s the big commish, setting up another Super Bowl by acknowledg­ing that he, too, no longer knows what a catch is in pro football.

Figure that one out and then maybe the NFL can make some progress.

 ??  ??
 ?? Tom Cruze / Chicago Sun-Times ?? Lions receiver Calvin Johnson (81) comes down in the end zone with the ball against the Bears on a play that was ruled and then upheld via replay as not a catch. The catch rule has been a moving target in the NFL.
Tom Cruze / Chicago Sun-Times Lions receiver Calvin Johnson (81) comes down in the end zone with the ball against the Bears on a play that was ruled and then upheld via replay as not a catch. The catch rule has been a moving target in the NFL.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States