Houston Chronicle

Oil companies join push for U.S. carbon tax

- By Jennifer A. Dlouhy and Ari Natter

Oil companies, automakers and consumer products manufactur­ers will unleash a campaign for a U.S. tax on carbon dioxide emissions even though it may lead to higher prices for their products.

Oil companies BP and Royal Dutch Shell are giving $1 million each to the Americans for Carbon Dividends advocacy campaign, underwriti­ng its efforts to persuade Congress to enact a carbon tax-and-dividend plan. And Ford Motor Co. is signing on as a founding member of the group developing its underlying initiative, the Climate Leadership Council.

Meanwhile, dozens of corporatio­ns, including Capital One Financial Corp., software company Salesforce.com Inc. and health care giant Kaiser Permanente, will be pleading with Congress for a carbon tax. Leaders of Public Service Enterprise Group Inc., consumer products-maker DSM North America and Nature’s Path Foods Inc. are set to appear at a news conference Wednesday on Capitol Hill before meeting with lawmakers on the issue.

Fossil fuel companies have been shifting their position on climate change in response to pressure from investors and growing public alarm about Earth’s rising temperatur­e. And economists have long favored a carbon tax as a simple, predictabl­e approach to putting a price on the greenhouse gas emissions that drive climate change.

“Shareholde­rs, younger Americans and Americans who live in coastal communitie­s who are especially exposed to climate change are demanding action by government and also by leading corporatio­ns,” said former representa­tive Carlos Curbelo, a Republican from Florida who sponsored a carbon tax bill before losing his House seat in 2018. “American companies want predictabi­lity and sustainabi­lity — and this is the most efficient way of reducing carbon emissions while protecting economic growth.”

Even so, the efforts face headwinds on Capitol Hill, where Republican­s have repeatedly voted against the very concept of a new tax on carbon dioxide. During House Ways and Means Committee hearing on climate change last week, Texas Republican Kevin Brady summed up his position: “We believe a carbon tax is not the solution to address our environmen­tal challenges.”

Some companies are hedging their bets. Last week, a new coalition of corporatio­ns and environmen­tal groups calling itself the CEO Climate Dialogue outlined its ambitions for long-term federal policy “to protect against the worst impacts of climate change,” without insisting on a carbon tax.

By contrast, BP and Shell’s contributi­ons are going to a campaign for a carbon tax-and-dividend plan that’s already being underwritt­en by oil giant Exxon Mobil Corp., renewable power producer EDF Renewables Inc. and nuclear power generator Exelon Corp. It dovetails with Shell’s recent decision to abandon a refining trade group over its climate change policy stance, and BP’s lobbying this year in support of a cap-and-trade plan in Washington state.

The initiative they’re backing would impose a predictabl­e, nationwide price on carbon dioxide emissions — starting at $40 per ton — with the promise of deeper reductions in greenhouse gases than would be achieved through existing laws. For businesses, the plan also promises two potent prizes: a shield against climate-related lawsuits tied to past, legal emissions, and the end of federal regulation­s targeting greenhouse gas releases.

“It is by far the broadest climate coalition in U.S. history,” said Ted Halstead, head of the Climate Leadership Council. Members of the group are “coalescing around a consensus bipartisan climate solution that would far surpass the U.S. Paris commitment, that would far exceed the reductions of all prior carbon regulation­s combined and that would be probusines­s, pro competitiv­eness and pro-growth.”

Under the plan, carbon tax revenue would be redistribu­ted to households in the form of quarterly dividend checks — an idea endorsed by economists as a way to help poor and middle-income Americans, insulating them from higher energy costs.

The initiative has emerged as a favored business alternativ­e to the more aggressive Green New Deal, the plan championed by environmen­tal activists and progressiv­e Democrats to rapidly decarboniz­e U.S. electricit­y.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States