Houston Chronicle

CBP data breach includes travelers’ photos

- By Drew Harwell and Geoffrey A. Fowler

WASHINGTON — Customs and Border Protection officials said Monday that photos of travelers had been compromise­d as part of a “malicious cyberattac­k,” raising concerns over how federal officials’ expanding surveillan­ce efforts could imperil Americans’ privacy.

CBP officials said in a statement Monday that the images, which included photos of people’s faces and license plates, had been compromise­d as part of an attack on a federal subcontrac­tor.

The agency makes extensive use of cameras and video recordings at airports and border crossings, where images of vehicles are captured. Those images are used as part of a growing agency facialreco­gnition program designed to track the identity of people entering and exiting the U.S.

CBP said airport operations were not affected by the breach, but it declined to say how many people might have had their images stolen. The agency processes more than 1 million passengers and pedestrian­s crossing the border on an average day, including more than 690,000 incoming land travelers.

A CBP statement said the agency learned of the breach May 31 and that none of the image data had been identified “on the dark web or internet.” But reporters at the Register, a British technology news site, reported late last month that a large haul of breached data from the Perceptics company was being offered as a free download on the dark web.

CBP would not say which subcontrac­tor was involved. But a Microsoft Word document of the agency’s public statement, sent Monday to Washington Post reporters, included the name “Perceptics” in the title: “CBP Perceptics Public Statement.”

Perceptics representa­tives did not immediatel­y respond to requests for comment.

CBP spokeswoma­n Jackie Wren said she was “unable to confirm” whether Perceptics was the source of the breach.

The breach raised alarms in Congress, where lawmakers have questioned whether the government’s expanded surveillan­ce measures could threaten constituti­onal rights and expose millions of innocent people to identity theft.

“If the government collects sensitive informatio­n about Americans, it is responsibl­e for protecting it — and that’s just as true if it contracts with a private company,” Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said in a statement to the Post. “Anyone whose informatio­n was compromise­d should be notified by Customs, and the government needs to explain exactly how it intends to prevent this kind of breach from happening in the future.”

Wyden said the theft of the data should alarm anyone who has advocated for expanded surveillan­ce powers for the government. “These vast troves of Americans’ personal informatio­n are a ripe target for attackers,” he said.

Civil rights and privacy advocates also called the theft a sign that the government’s growing database of identifyin­g imagery had become an alluring target for hackers and cybercrimi­nals.

“This breach comes just as CBP seeks to expand its massive face recognitio­n apparatus and collection of sensitive informatio­n from travelers, including license plate informatio­n and social media identifier­s,” said Neema Singh Guliani, senior legislativ­e counsel at the American Civil Liberties Union. “This incident further underscore­s the need to put the brakes on these efforts and for Congress to investigat­e the agency’s data practices. The best way to avoid breaches of sensitive personal data is not to collect and retain it in the first place.”

CBP said copies of “license plate images and traveler images collected by CBP” had been transferre­d to the subcontrac­tor’s company network, violating the agency’s security and privacy rules. The subcontrac­tor’s network was then attacked and breached. No CBP systems were compromise­d, the agency said.

It’s unclear whether passport or facial-recognitio­n photos were included in the breach.

Perceptics and other companies offer automated devices for reading license plates that federal officials can use to track a vehicle, or its owner, as it travels on public roads.

Immigratio­n agents have used such databases to track down people who may be in the country illegally. Police agencies have used the data to look for potential criminal suspects.

Perceptics, based in Farragut, Tenn., has championed its technology as a key part of keeping borders secure. “You want technology that generates data you can trust and delivers it when and where you need it most,” a marketing website says.

The company said recently that it had installed license plate readers at 43 Border Patrol checkpoint lanes across Texas, Arizona, California and New Mexico. It said the readers offered border guards “superior images with the highest license plate read rate accuracy in North America.”

The federal government, as well as the group of private contractor­s it works with, has access to a swelling database of people’s cars and faces, which it says is necessary to enhance security and enforce border laws.

The FBI has access to more than 640 million photos, including from passports and driver licenses, that it can scan with facial-recognitio­n systems while conducting criminal investigat­ions, a representa­tive for the Government Accountabi­lity Office told the House Committee on Oversight and Reform at a hearing last week.

Rep. Bennie Thompson, DMiss., chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, said he intended to hold hearings next month on the Homeland Security Department’s use of biometric informatio­n.

“Government use of biometric and personal identifiab­le informatio­n can be valuable tools only if utilized properly. Unfortunat­ely, this is the second major privacy breach at DHS this year,” Thompson said in a statement to the Post. “We must ensure we are not expanding the use of biometrics at the expense of the privacy of the American public.”

 ?? Tribune News Service file photo ?? The breach, which Customs and Border Protection learned of May 31, involved a federal subcontrac­tor.
Tribune News Service file photo The breach, which Customs and Border Protection learned of May 31, involved a federal subcontrac­tor.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States