Houston Chronicle

Judge rules Georgia must scrap old voting machines

- By Kate Brumback

ATLANTA — A federal judge overseeing a challenge to Georgia’s outdated voting system said that after years of inaction in the face of warnings about vulnerabil­ities, state officials have finally taken a solid step in the right direction. But she foreshadow­ed a looming fight over the state’s new system, writing that “it may be ‘like ‘deja vu all over again.’ ”

U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg’s order on Thursday prohibits the state from using its antiquated paperless touchscree­n machines and election management system beyond this year. She also said the state must be ready to use hand-marked paper ballots if its new system isn’t in place for the March 24 presidenti­al primary election.

“Georgia’s current voting equipment, software, election and voter databases, are antiquated, seriously flawed, and vulnerable to failure, breach, contaminat­ion, and attack,” she wrote.

Totenberg also said the plaintiffs would likely win at trial, citing “the mountain of voter testimony showing that these vulnerabil­ities have a tangible impact on these voters’ attempts to exercise their fundamenta­l right to cast a ballot and have their vote counted.”

Election integrity advocates and individual voters sued Georgia election officials in 2017 alleging that the touchscree­n voting machines the state has used since 2002 are unsecure and vulnerable to hacking. They had asked Totenberg to order an immediate switch to hand-marked paper ballots.

Totenberg had declined a similar request last year ahead of last November’s gubernator­ial election, and she again held back from ordering an immediate switch on Thursday, citing concerns about the state’s capacity to make an interim switch to hand-marked paper ballots for special and municipal elections this fall while also working to implement a new system.

This ruling applies only to Georgia, but at least parts of eight other states still use paperless balloting. Using voter registrati­on and turnout data, the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law estimated in a report this week that as many as 12 percent of voters, or around 16 million people, will vote on paperless equipment in November 2020.

Georgia’s new system, following specificat­ions approved by the Republican­led state legislatur­e, was certified last week by Secretary of State Brad Raffensper­ger, who said it will be in place for the primaries. The state’s $106 million contract with Denver-based Dominion Voting Systems includes new touchscree­n voting machines that print a paper record with a code that’s read by a scanner.

The plaintiffs in this lawsuit have said the new machines have many of the same vulnerabil­ities as the old ones. They also object to the fact that the portion of the printed record that’s read by the scanner is a QR code, not human-verifiable text, meaning voters have to trust that the code accurately reflects their selections.

Totenberg praised the legislatio­n providing for a new system as “an essential step forward out of the quagmire, even if just to terminate use of an antiquated vulnerable voting system.”

Both sides in the case saw victory in Totenberg’s order.

“(W)e are pleased the Court endorsed the policy decisions of the state’s elected officials to move to a new paper ballot voting system in time for the 2020 elections while not disrupting the 2019 elections,” Raffensper­ger said in an emailed statement. “These activist plaintiffs continue fruitlessl­y attempting to force their preferred policy outcomes on Georgia voters without success.”

Marilyn Marks, executive director of the Coalition for Good Governance, one of the plaintiffs in the case, wrote in an email that it was important that Totenberg “recognized Plaintiffs concerns about the State’s plan to move to another form of electronic voting — electronic ballot marking devices.” The voters’ right to accountabl­e elections requires hand-marked paper ballots counted by optical scanners with thorough audits, she wrote.

David Cross, a lawyer representi­ng several Georgia voters in the case, called the ruling a “big win for all Georgia voters and those working across the country to secure elections and protect the right to vote.”

 ?? Mike Stewart / Associated Press ?? A federal judge has ordered Georgia to stop using its outdated voting machines after 2019. The machines have been in use since 2002, and plaintiffs argued they are unsecure and vulnerable to hacking.
Mike Stewart / Associated Press A federal judge has ordered Georgia to stop using its outdated voting machines after 2019. The machines have been in use since 2002, and plaintiffs argued they are unsecure and vulnerable to hacking.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States