Houston Chronicle

In 7 minutes, House panel votes along party lines to move forward with charging Trump of abusing his power, obstructin­g Congress

- By Nicholas Fandos

WASHINGTON — A fiercely divided House Judiciary Committee approved two articles of impeachmen­t against President Donald Trump on Friday, setting up a historic vote before the full House that would make him only the third president to be impeached.

The impeachmen­t articles, passed over fierce Republican protests, accused the president of abusing the power of his office and obstructin­g Congress. The votes and a fractious twoday debate preceding them reflected the realities of the hyperparti­san divisions in U.S. politics that have grown wider during Trump’s three years in office.

With back-to-back votes shortly after 10 a.m., the Democratic-controlled committee recommende­d that the House ratify the articles of impeachmen­t against the 45th president, over Republican protest. Each passed, 23-17, along strictly partisan lines.

The full House is expected to vote Wednesday to impeach Trump, and he would stand trial in the Senate in the new year.

“Today is a solemn and sad day,” Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y. and chairman of the Judiciary Committee, said after the votes. “For the third time in a little over a century and a half, the House Judiciary Committee has voted articles of impeachmen­t against the president, for abuse of power and obstructio­n of

Congress. The House will act expeditiou­sly.”

At the White House, Trump was defiant, denouncing impeachmen­t as a “witch hunt” and a “sham” that would come back to bite Democrats the next time their party held the presidency.

“I think it’s a horrible thing to be using the tool of impeachmen­t, which is supposed to be used in an emergency,” Trump told reporters shortly after the Judiciary Committee votes, during a meeting in the Oval Office with President Mario Abdo Benítez of Paraguay.

“It’s a very sad thing for our country,” Trump added, “but it seems to be very good for me politicall­y.”

Despite Trump’s confident prediction, it is far from clear how the impeachmen­t drama, unfolding only 10 months before a presidenti­al election, will affect him or either political party.

Public polls show the country split over impeachmen­t, and some find a small majority in favor of removing the president — roughly the same proportion that voted against him three years ago. But Trump has been buoyed by data that suggests that the issue has increased the intensity of support for him among the most devoted Republican­s.

The charges ratified Friday accuse Trump of pressuring Ukraine to investigat­e former Vice President Joe Biden, his political rival, and an unsubstant­iated theory that Democrats conspired with Ukraine to interfere in the 2016 election. He did so, Democrats said, using as leverage nearly $400 million in security assistance for Ukraine’s fight against Russia and a coveted White House meeting for its president.

Trump then sought to conceal the scheme from Congress, the Judiciary Committee charged, ordering unpreceden­ted, across-the-board stonewalli­ng of its investigat­ion unlike any “in the history of the republic.” It amounted to an effort by the president to undermine the separation of powers and limit his accountabi­lity, the panel said.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., weighed which lawmakers she should appoint as impeachmen­t managers to prosecute the case against the president in the Senate, as Democrats on the Judiciary and Intelligen­ce Committees jockeyed intensely to win one of the coveted six to eight slots.

Republican­s, who control the Senate, planned to consult through the weekend with the White House about the contours and length of a trial. Confident the process would end in Trump’s acquittal, they were working to sort through divisions over whether to move ahead with a streamline­d proceeding or with a more theatrical, drawn-out affair.

A longer trial could feature witnesses presenting a robust defense of Trump, but it could also risk underminin­g the gravity of the impeachmen­t process.

The votes Friday took place in the Ways and Means Committee Room the morning after a contentiou­s 14hour Judiciary Committee session that stretched past 11 p.m. Thursday. During that session, Democrats turned back a number of Republican efforts to gut or weaken the charges, and members of both parties feuded over impeaching the president. Republican­s argued not only that Trump’s conduct was not impeachabl­e, but also that his actions were entirely justified and explained by more innocent intentions.

Nadler abruptly paused the session Thursday night before bringing the articles to a final vote, saying he wanted members to take the time to “search their conscience­s” before the historic roll call. After Republican­s had dragged out the debate for hours, Democrats said they did not want such consequent­ial action to occur late at night, when the American public was unlikely to be watching.

On Friday morning, 40 members of the panel (one was absent after a heart procedure) solemnly took their places on the wood-carved dais and voted without any further debate. After a week of accusation­s and recriminat­ion, the votes took only seven minutes, and the committee adjourned immediatel­y afterward.

Democrats had gathered just before the votes in a cloakroom, where Rep. Lucy McBath of Georgia led them in a rare moment of prayer.

Presidents Andrew Johnson in 1868 and Bill Clinton in 1998 were both impeached on largely partisan votes but were later acquitted by the Senate. President Richard Nixon resigned in 1974 after the Judiciary Committee approved charges against him and just before the House could vote to impeach him.

The charges against Trump paralleled some of the articles drawn up against Nixon. And the votes Friday occurred almost exactly 21 years after the judiciary panel voted to recommend the impeachmen­t of Clinton on charges of perjury, obstructio­n of justice and abuse of power.

Trump has insisted he did nothing wrong. His personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani, whose intense public pursuit of the investigat­ions into Trump’s political rivals provided the kindling that helped fuel the impeachmen­t inquiry, was seen at the White House on Friday as the Judiciary Committee was voting.

Over the past two weeks, the president declined to send his lawyers to participat­e in the hearings or offer a White House defense before the House, breaking with the approach of Nixon and Clinton. Trump did not want to lend the proceeding­s legitimacy and argued he would get a fairer trial in the Senate.

Republican leaders in the upper chamber indicated Thursday, in the run-up to the votes, that they wanted a speedy trial and would work hand in glove with Trump’s defense team — an announceme­nt that quickly drew a rebuke from Democrats, who pointed out that senators take an oath to “do impartial justice” in an impeachmen­t trial.

Asked Friday if he wanted a short trial, Trump said, “I’ll do whatever I want.”

He added, “We did nothing wrong, so I’ll do long or short.”

Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., the majority leader, predicted there was “no chance” 67 senators — the twothirds majority needed for a conviction — would vote to remove Trump in an election year.

The conclusion­s by the House Intelligen­ce Committee were based on documents and testimony from more than a dozen senior U.S. diplomats and White House officials. They said that over the spring and fall, Trump empowered Giuliani and a group of allies inside the government to toss out official U.S. policy toward Ukraine and supplant it with the president’s personal interests in what one witness called “a domestic political errand.”

However, the House never heard from some of those closest to Trump who could have shed further light on the scheme and the president’s thinking, based on the White House’s orders not to comply. During the debate this week, Republican­s accused Democrats of rushing to conclusion­s without all of the facts.

 ?? Evan Vucci / Associated Press ?? President Trump, with Vice President Mike Pence, denounced impeachmen­t as a “witch hunt” and a “sham.”
Evan Vucci / Associated Press President Trump, with Vice President Mike Pence, denounced impeachmen­t as a “witch hunt” and a “sham.”
 ?? Saul Loeb / AFP via Getty Images ?? Rep. Mike Johnson, R-La., has predicted “irreparabl­e damage to our country” in arguing against impeaching President Donald Trump.
Saul Loeb / AFP via Getty Images Rep. Mike Johnson, R-La., has predicted “irreparabl­e damage to our country” in arguing against impeaching President Donald Trump.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States