Houston Chronicle

Facebook reverses on paid influencer­s after Bloomberg ads

- By Barbara Ortutay and Amanda Seitz

SAN FRANCISCO — Facebook has decided to let political campaigns pay online influencer­s to spread their messages, a practice that had sidesteppe­d many of the social network’s rules governing political ads.

Friday’s policy reversal highlights difficulti­es tech companies and regulators have in keeping up with the changing nature of paid political messages.

The change comes days after Democratic presidenti­al candidate Mike Bloomberg exploited a loophole to run humorous messages promoting his campaign on the accounts of popular Instagram personalit­ies followed by millions of younger people.

The Bloomberg posts weren’t much more than self-deprecatin­g humor used to sell the candidate’s old guy appeal, using a tactic that until now was largely used to sell skin care products or clothing-subscripti­on services. But the lack of oversight and clear rules around influencer marketing, not to mention their effectiven­ess in reaching younger audiences, makes them ripe for misuse.

Bloomberg’s effort skirted many of the rules that tech companies have imposed on political ads to safeguard U.S. elections from malicious foreign and domestic interferen­ce and misinforma­tion. Online political ads have been controvers­ial, especially after it was revealed Russia used them in an attempt to influence the 2016 presidenti­al election. In response, Facebook has rolled out a number of rules to prevent a repeat of that, though it has declined to fact-check political ads and refuses to ban even blatantly false messages from politician­s.

Before the explosion of social media, it was clearer what’s an ad and what isn’t — and thus what’s subject to disclosure­s and other rules. With social media, a campaign can pay celebritie­s and other influentia­l users to spread a message on their behalf, without ever buying an ad and be subject to its rules.

“This is a new kind of activity that simply didn’t exist when the rules for internet political communicat­ions were last updated,” said Commission­er Ellen L. Weintraub of the Federal Election Commission.

Friday’s policy change involves what Facebook calls “branded content” — sponsored items posted by ordinary users who are typically paid by companies or organizati­ons. Advertiser­s pay the influentia­l users directly to post about their brand.

Facebook doesn’t make money directly from such posts and doesn’t consider them advertisin­g. As a result, branded content wasn’t governed by Facebook’s advertisin­g policies, which require candidates and campaigns to verify their identity with a U.S. ID or mailing address and disclose how much they spent running each ad.

Until Friday, Facebook tried to deter campaigns from using such branded content by barring them from using a tool designed to help advertiser­s run such posts on Facebook and Instagram, which is owned by Facebook. The rule change now allows campaigns in the U.S. to use this tool, provided they’ve been authorized by Facebook to run political ads and disclose who paid for the sponsored posts. Campaigns that avoid using the tool, as Bloomberg had, risk having their accounts suspended.

“After hearing from multiple campaigns, we agree that there’s a place for branded content in political discussion on our platforms,” Facebook said in an exclusive statement to The Associated Press. “We’re allowing U.S.based political candidates to work with creators to run this content.”

Politician­s still won’t be required to disclose how much they paid the influencer­s to run the posts. And the posts won’t appear in Facebook’s ad library, which publicly catalogs political ads and allows other campaigns, journalist­s and watchdog groups to view the type of messages politician­s are pushing in the election.

Facebook’s new rules won’t apply to someone merely creating or sharing a post about a politician without getting paid.

Facebook said it is asking the influencer accounts that posted the Bloomberg memes to retroactiv­ely use the tool meant for such posts. After this happens, the posts will be labeled as a “paid partnershi­p” with Bloomberg.

The Bloomberg campaign had taken the unconventi­onal step of paying social media influencer­s — individual­s with huge followings — to post Bloomberg memes using their Instagram accounts. Different versions of the sponsored posts from the Bloomberg campaign ran on more than a dozen influentia­l Instagram accounts, each of which have millions of followers.The Bloomberg campaign declined to say how much it paid for the sponsored posts, or if it had more in the works.

 ??  ?? Bloomberg
Bloomberg

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States