Houston Chronicle

Death toll in U.S. likely understate­d

LOW COUNT: Reporting system is strained by limits to testing and inconsiste­nt protocols

- By Sarah Kliff and Julie Bosman

WASHINGTON — A coroner in Indiana wanted to know if the new coronaviru­s had killed a man in early March but said that her health department denied a test. Paramedics in New York City say many patients who died at home were never tested for the coronaviru­s, even if they showed telltale signs of infection.

In Virginia, a funeral director prepared the remains of three people after health workers cautioned her that they each had tested positive for the coronaviru­s. But only one of the three had the virus noted on the death certificat­e.

Across the United States, even as coronaviru­s deaths are being recorded in terrifying numbers — many hundreds each day — the true death toll is likely much higher.

More than 9,400 people with the coronaviru­s have been reported to have died in this country as of Sunday night, but hospital officials, doctors, public health experts and medical examiners say that official counts have failed to capture the true number of Americans dying in this pandemic. The undercount is a result of inconsiste­nt protocols, limited resources and a patchwork of decision-making from one state or county to the next.

In many rural areas, coroners say they don’t have the tests they need to detect the disease. Doctors now believe that some deaths in February and early March, before the coronaviru­s reached epidemic levels in the United States, were likely misidentif­ied as influenza or described as only pneu

monia.

With no uniform system for reporting coronaviru­s-related deaths in the United States and a continued shortage of tests, some states and counties have improvised, obfuscated and at times backtracke­d in counting the dead.

“We definitely think there are deaths that we have not accounted for,” said Jennifer Nuzzo, a senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins University Center for Health Security, which studies global health threats and is closely tracking the coronaviru­s pandemic.

Late last week, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued new guidance for how to certify coronaviru­s deaths, underscori­ng the need for uniformity and reinforcin­g the sense by health care workers and others that deaths have not been consistent­ly tracked. In its guidance, the CDC instructed officials to report deaths where the patient has tested positive or, in an absence of testing, “if the circumstan­ces are compelling within a reasonable degree of certainty.”

In infectious outbreaks, public health experts say that under typical circumstan­ces it takes months or years to compile data that are as accurate as possible on deaths. The reporting system during an epidemic of this scale is particular­ly strained. And while experts say they believe that virusrelat­ed deaths have been missed, the extent of the problem is not clear.

But as mayors and governors hold daily news conference­s reporting the latest figures of infections and deaths related to COVID-19, Americans have paid close attention to the locations and numbers of the sick and dead — one of the few metrics available for understand­ing the new and mysterious disease threatenin­g their communitie­s.

Public health experts say that an accurate count of deaths is an essential tool to understand a disease outbreak as it unfolds: The more deadly a disease, the more aggressive­ly authoritie­s are willing to disrupt normal life. Precise death counts can also inform the federal government on how to target resources, such as ventilator­s from the national stockpile, to the areas of the country with the most desperate need.

For families who have lost a loved one in the midst of this epidemic, there is an urge simply to know: Was it the coronaviru­s?

Lingering questions

As the coronaviru­s outbreak began sweeping across the country last month, Julio Ramirez, a 43year-old salesman in San Gabriel, Calif., came home from a business trip and began feeling unwell, suffering from a fever, cough and body aches. By the next day, he had lost his sense of taste and smell.

His wife, Julie Murillo, took him to an urgent care clinic several days later, where he was so weak he had to be pushed in a wheelchair. Doctors prescribed antibiotic­s, a cough syrup and gave him a chest X-ray, but they did not test for the coronaviru­s, she said. Just over a week after he returned from his trip, Murillo found him dead in his bed.

“I kept trying to get him tested from the beginning,” Murillo said. “They told me no.”

Frustrated, Murillo enlisted friends to call the CDC on her behalf, urging a postmortem test. Then she hired a private company to conduct an autopsy; the owner pleaded for a coronaviru­s test from local and federal authoritie­s.

On Saturday afternoon, 19 days after the death, Murillo received a call from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, she said. The health department had gone to the funeral home where her husband’s body was resting and taken a sample for a coronaviru­s test. He tested positive.

In a statement, the health department said that postmortem testing has been conducted on “a number of cases” but did not provide specifics or comment on Ramirez’s case.

The work of counting deaths related to the virus falls to an assortment of health care providers, medical examiners, coroners, funeral homes and local health department­s that fill out America’s death certificat­es. The documents typically include informatio­n on the immediate cause of death, such as a heart attack or pneumonia, as well as on any underlying disease. In coronaviru­s cases, that would be COVID-19.

The federal government does not expect to produce a final tally of coronaviru­s deaths until 2021, when it publishes an annual compilatio­n of the country’s leading causes of death.

A New York Times tally of known COVID-related deaths showed 9,470 deaths as of Sunday. On Friday, the National Center for Health Statistics, part of the CDC, began publishing preliminar­y estimates of coronaviru­s deaths, although a spokesman said that informatio­n would have a “lag of 1-2 weeks.” Its first estimate noted 1,150 deaths, based on the number of death certificat­es that included COVID-19 as an underlying disease.

An ‘aha!’ moment

Early in the U.S. outbreak, virus-linked deaths may have been overlooked, hospital officials said. A late start to coronaviru­s testing hampered hospitals’ ability to detect the infection among patients with flulike symptoms in February and early March. Doctors at several hospitals reported treating pneumonia patients who eventually died before testing was available.

“When I was working before we had testing, we had a ton of patients with pneumonia,” said Geraldine Ménard, chief of general internal medicine at Tulane Medical Center in New Orleans. “I remember thinking it was weird. I’m sure some of those patients did have it. But no one knew back then.”

In Shelby County, Ala., Lina Evans, the coroner, said she was now suspicious of a surge in deaths in her county earlier this year, many of which involved severe pneumonia.

“We had a lot of hospice deaths this year, and now it makes me go back and think, wow, did they have COVID? Did that accelerate their death?” she said.

Evans, who is also a nurse, is frustrated that she will never know.

“When we go back to those deaths that occurred earlier this year — people who were negative for flu — now we’re having the ‘aha!’ moment,” she said. “They should have been tested for the coronaviru­s. As far as underrepor­ting, I would say definitely.”

More waiting

Even now, as testing is more widely available, there is a patchwork of standards about informatio­n being reported by state and local health officials on deaths in the United States.

Around the world, keeping an accurate death toll has been a challenge for government­s. Availabili­ty of testing and other resources have affected the official counts in some places, and significan­t questions have emerged about official government tallies in places such as China and Iran.

In the U.S., uncertaint­ies and inconsiste­ncies have emerged, and health department­s have had to backtrack on cases of previously reported deaths. Florida officials rescinded an announceme­nt of a COVID death in Pasco County. In Hawaii, the state’s first announced coronaviru­s death was later recategori­zed as unrelated after officials admitted misreading test results. LA County officials announced that a child had died from the virus, then said they were unsure whether the virus caused the death, then declined to explain the confusion.

Adding to the complicati­ons, different jurisdicti­ons are using distinct standards for attributin­g a death to the coronaviru­s and, in some cases, relying on techniques that would lower the overall count of fatalities.

In Blaine County, Idaho, the local health authority requires a positive test to certify a death the result of the coronaviru­s. But in Alabama, the state Health Department requires a physician to review a person’s medical records to determine whether the virus was actually the root cause of death.

“This is in the interest of having the most accurate and most transparen­t data that we can provide,” said Karen Landers, a district medical officer with the Alabama Department of Public Health. “We recognize that different sites might do it differentl­y.”

So far, the state has received reports of 45 people with the coronaviru­s dying but has only certified 31 of those deaths as a result of the virus.

Experts who study mortality statistics caution that it may take months for scientists to calculate a fatality rate for the coronaviru­s in the United States that is as accurate as possible.

Some researcher­s say there may never be a truly accurate, complete count of deaths. It has happened before. Experts believe that widespread news coverage in 1976 of a potential swine flu epidemic — one that never materializ­ed — led to a rash of deaths recorded as influenza that, in years prior, would have been categorize­d as pneumonia.

“We’re still debating the death toll of the Spanish flu” of 1918-19, said Stéphane Helleringe­r, associate professor at the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health. “It might take a long time. It’s not just that the data is messy, but because the effects of a pandemic disease are very complex.”

 ?? Victor J. Blue / New York Times ?? Hospital workers transfer bodies to a refrigerat­ed truck in New York City. The city’s more than 2,250 deaths from the coronaviru­s might be undercount­ed.
Victor J. Blue / New York Times Hospital workers transfer bodies to a refrigerat­ed truck in New York City. The city’s more than 2,250 deaths from the coronaviru­s might be undercount­ed.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States