Houston Chronicle

Investors see potential for carbon storage on Gulf Coast

- By James Osborne STAFF WRITER

WASHINGTON— Twoyears ago, Louisiana investor Chas Roemer was moving ahead on building a liquefied natural gas export terminal in southwest Louisiana when he ripped up his plans.

With customers abroad under regulatory pressures to address climate change, he decided his project needed to be cleaner than the glut of other LNG facilities going up along the Gulf Coast. Roemer, a partner at a Baton Rouge private equity firm, began looking into storing undergroun­d the vast amounts of carbon dioxide his facility would produce.

And he wasn’t alone. Plans are underway for nearly a dozen commercial-scale carbon repositori­es along the Gulf Coast, which, if completed, would begin putting back into the ground the carbon dioxide that has flowed to the surface as oil and natural gas for more than a century. Among the developers are the Houston oil company Occidental Petroleum and one of Louisiana’s largest landholder­s, the Stream family.

“We felt the demand was going to be there for clean energy, and to have an old product wasn’t going to be competitiv­e,” Roemer said. “The question was, could you (capture and store emissions) profitably ?”

For decades, companies such

as Occidental have pumped carbon dioxide undergroun­d to aid in oil and gas production. But storing carbon dioxide undergroun­d strictly to combat climate change was considered an unlikely enterprise without a massive injection of government money or without the creation of a national carbon tax or other pricing mechanism to force polluters into the practice.

But after a 2018 expansion of the federal government’s carbon capture incentive program, polluters can earn a $50 tax credit for each ton of carbon dioxide they store. Roemer’s LNG plant, which at full capacity would emit about 4 million tons of carbon a year, could gain a $200 million reduction in its tax bill.

Carbon is stored by being compressed and pumped into undergroun­d saltwater aquifers that are believed to be sealed from the atmosphere — as well as drinking water supplies— so as to allow safe storage for centuries to come. Whether the greenhouse gas can be captured, put in pipelines and pumped undergroun­d for less than the price of the tax credit remains unproven, but investors are beginning to believe it can be done, most likely at plants making products such as methanol or LNG, which emit pure streams of carbon dioxide that can be captured cheaply.

“That $50-a-ton credit could be enough to justify the entire enterprise,” said Brad Crabtree, director of the Carbon Capture Coalition, a trade group whose membership includes the oil giant Royal Dutch Shell and the St. Louis coal miner Peabody Energy. “You have this huge concentrat­ion of industrial emissions, maybe half of U.S. emissions in Louisiana and Texas. They’re in very close proximity, so you can have multiple facilities taking advantage of the same pipeline system. You get an economy of scale.”

Investors and state politician­s in Louisiana are already envisionin­g the creation of a carbon storage hub along the Gulf Coast, offering a valuable service for the region’s oil, natural gas and petrochemi­cal industries as they struggle to remain viable in a lowcarbon world.

Late last month, the Stream family, whose vast holdings include timber, cattle and oil wells, caught the attention of many in the energy sector when the family said it would develop a carbon storage site spanning thousands of acres along the southwest coast of Louisiana.

The Streams declined to provide a cost estimate, but the family is financing the project itself, believing there’s a captive market in the growing number of companies pledging to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, said Benjamin Heard, a partner in the project and former executive at Direct Energy, a retail electricit­y company.

“These are multigener­ational landowners who have watched the petrochemi­cal expansion along the Gulf Coast,” he said. “And when the tax credit was passed, they began to think strategica­lly howthe updated tax credit might impact investment decisions.”

Oxy’s project

Roughly 30 carbon capture projects are under developmen­t in the United States. At least half are planning to inject the carbon dioxide undergroun­d for permanent storage, with no plans for use in oil production, according to the Carbon Capture Coalition.

Among them is an unnamed project in Louisiana by Occidental Petroleum. The project would have the capacity to store 10 million tons of carbon dioxide each year, the equivalent of the annual emissions of more than 2 million cars. Occidental declined to discuss the project, saying it was still in “early stages of planning.”

Within Occidental, carbon storage is viewed as a potentiall­y lucrative business, given its long experience pumping carbon dioxide undergroun­d to aid oil production, a process known as enhanced recovery.

“Occidental has been implementi­ng carbon capture, utilizatio­n and storage in our Permian operations for more than 40 years,” Richard Jackson, president of Occidental’s onshore and carbon management divisions, said in a statement.

Whether these projects get built remains to be seen. The Stream family, which is the furthest along, just applied to the Environmen­tal Protection Agency for a permit, a process that could take up to five years.

For years now, factories and power plants have made money selling captured carbon dioxide to oil companies — negating much of the environmen­tal benefit of capturing the greenhouse gas. The recent plunge in oil prices, however, hasmade the enterprise unprofitab­le, spurring a groundswel­l toward pure carbon storage, said Tip Meckel, a researcher at the Bureau of Economic Geology at the University of Texas.

Earlier this year, NRG Energy shut down the $1 billion carbon capture system at its coal-fired power plant in Fort Bend County, citing the lack of demand for carbon dioxide at nearby oil fields.

“Alot of the earlier thinking was we do (enhanced oil recovery) and storing CO2 is an add-on, and now it’s the opposite,” Meckel said. “A lot of people are interested in developing storage sites.”

And carbon storage is gaining momentum overseas. The Norwegian government is bankrollin­g a massive storage site under the North Sea, with plans to take emissions from carbon capture sites across Europe. The Australian government has required Chevron to store undergroun­d the carbon emissions froma natural gas field the company developed there.

The concept is catching on in the United States, too. In Louisiana, Gov. John Bel Edwards has instructed his climate task force to examine developing a carbon storage industry. The state Legislatur­e passed a bill to lower bureaucrat­ic hurdles, and the state has applied to the EPA for authority to permit carbon storage sites.

“Oil and gas is a big part of our (economy), but the question we’re asking is howwe can continue to do business as usual,” said Jason Lanclos, director of technology at Louisiana’s State Energy Office. “The oil and gas and manufactur­ing sectors are coming to us and saying, ‘What can you do for us?’ ”

With its sprawling refining and petrochemi­cal complex, Texas emits more carbon dioxide than any state. And with similar geology to Louisiana, East Texas has plenty of undergroun­d aquifers and depleted oil and gas fields ideal for carbon storage projects, experts say.

Little support in Texas

Texas lags behind other oil and gas states, including Louisiana, Oklahoma, Wyoming and North Dakota, which have sought or received authority from the EPA to permit carbon storage sites. In a state where climate skepticism runs deep, Gov. Greg Abbott has not signaled support for developing carbon storage nor has the Legislatur­e moved to obtain permitting authority from EPA. Abbott’s office did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

“It’s fair to say the Texas state government has not been as proactive as other states,” Meckel said. “I have no doubt Texas will be an enormous player in this space, but they do need to dig in. It doesn’t just happen.”

Still, there is some movement in Texas. Last month, the Texas General Land Office decided to begin seeking developers for an offshore carbon capture field in the Gulf of Mexico, off Port Arthur.

Across the border in Louisiana, both Republican­s and Democrats are supporting the concept of turning the state into a carbon capture hub. Roemer, son of former Louisiana Gov. Buddy Roemer, a Democrat turned Republican, said climate skepticism abounds in his state, but a distinct pragmatism has developed around the issue.

“Whether you agree or don’t agree with climate change, I’m an exporter, and the market around the world is going to want a netzero product,” he said. “We’re going to show others you can be both clean and profitable, and I want to move our entire state in that direction. That’s a solution that should satisfy just about everyone.”

 ?? Marie D. De Jesús / Staff file photo ?? NRG Energy shut down its carbon capture system in Fort Bend citing a lack of demand for carbon dioxide nearby.
Marie D. De Jesús / Staff file photo NRG Energy shut down its carbon capture system in Fort Bend citing a lack of demand for carbon dioxide nearby.
 ?? Chandan Khanna / AFP via Getty Images ?? An oil and gas processing plant in Lake Charles, La. The concentrat­ion of refineries, chemical plants and LNG processors along the Gulf Coast is spurring proposals to develop carbon storage facilities.
Chandan Khanna / AFP via Getty Images An oil and gas processing plant in Lake Charles, La. The concentrat­ion of refineries, chemical plants and LNG processors along the Gulf Coast is spurring proposals to develop carbon storage facilities.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States