Houston Chronicle

Politicall­y mixed marriages tested and strengthen­ed in the Trump era.

- By Claire Cain Miller

There are few remaining areas of American life in which people aren’t sorting themselves by political allegiance­s — including romantic relationsh­ips.

Politicall­y mixed marriages are rare, and over the past four years, Americans have become less willing to date someone with different political views, research has shown.

Now there’s evidence that the heightened partisansh­ip has — paradoxica­lly — led politicall­y mixed couples to understand each other better than before. Surveys have shown that couples often are confused about how aligned they are: Women underestim­ate the likelihood that their spouses are voting Democrat, while men overestima­te that their spouses are voting Republican. But this election cycle, these gaps are smaller, according to New York Times/Siena College polling in three battlegrou­nd states.

Although a sizable share of Americans don’t follow current events closely and don’t vote, the Donald Trump presidency has been so polarizing and omnipresen­t that many voters say it has been all but impossible to avoid politics, even for couples who ordinarily do.

“Before Trump, we rarely talked about politics,” said Bradley Hutchinson, 58, an automotive technician in Glendale, Ariz.

That changed in 2016. At the time, his wife, Denise, 64, a manager at a utility, was uncertain about Trump.

Her views are much stronger now.

“I’m voting for him because of what he’s done and what he supports and what he fights for,” she said.

Politicall­y aligned marriages are part of a greater sorting happening in the United States. People are increasing­ly marrying people like themselves in terms of education and earnings potential, and living in places surrounded by others who share their beliefs and lifestyle. These things are correlated with political views.

“There is plenty of evidence that people are prioritizi­ng politics in a way they didn’t before, in both friendship and dating,” said Daniel A. Cox, a research fellow in polling at the American Enterprise Institute.

Party registrati­ons don’t necessaril­y represent political views. Still, it is striking that 1 in 10 voters who are registered as a Democrat or Republican are married to someone in the opposite party, according to a recent paper. The paper, by Eitan Hersh of Tufts and Yair Ghitza of Catalist, a research firm, analyzed voter registrati­on data on 18.3 million married, oppositese­x couples.

Women and Democrats are the groups that care most about having the same political views as their romantic partner, according to a 2020 installmen­t of the institute’s American Perspectiv­es Survey. Trump has been particular­ly divisive, it found. Nearly two-thirds of Americans said they would not consider dating someone who disagreed with them about the president. Eight in 10 Democratic women said so.

In the Times/Siena poll, married men in Arizona, Ohio and Nevada preferred Trump over Joe Biden by 13 percentage points, and married women preferred Trump by 1 point. (In general, married people are more conservati­ve than single people, and men more conservati­ve than women.)

Michelle Krueger, a 24-year-old student in Phoenix, said she and her husband talk about politics often and sometimes disagree. But they never differ on their support for the president.

“We didn’t have to convince each other,” she said.

For others, it can get acrimoniou­s. Most people who disagree with their partners about politics avoid the topic, the American Perspectiv­es Survey found. Voter turnout is lower for mixed-partisan couples, who may skip voting to minimize conflict, Hersh said.

Bertha Brunton, 52, a school health care provider in Angelus Oaks, Calif., plans to vote for Biden. Her husband, George, a retired firefighti­ng captain, supports Trump, to her great dismay. For him, gun rights supersede everything else.

“We decided not to talk about politics anymore because we couldn’t come to agreements,” she said. “My son is on my side, my oldest daughter is on his side, so it was causing conflict in every part of our family.”

In the Times/Siena poll, of 1,241 voters who are married or in committed relationsh­ips in Arizona, Ohio and Nevada, 47 percent of women said they were voting for Biden — but just 42 percent of men thought their partner was. Forty-three percent of women said they were voting for Trump, but 47 percent of men said their partner was. (The poll did not ask the sex of their partner.)

Sarah Longwell, a never-Trump Republican political strategist, has done about 50 focus groups in the past two years with women who voted for Trump in 2016. She said she has heard from some who plan to vote for Biden but aren’t telling their families or friends.

“There’s a reluctance to be public about their feelings about Trump, because where they live, the overwhelmi­ng sentiment is even if you don’t think Trump is great, the Democrats are definitely worse,” she said. “I have women say, ‘My husband would be so surprised to hear me talking like this.’ ”

But for many couples who have typically disagreed on politics, life is more harmonious now. People who married members of the opposite party are more likely to be moderate, and in this particular election, that may mean they’re both voting for Biden, researcher­s said.

Elisabeth and Patrick Foreman, of Chandler, Ariz., didn’t vote in 2016 because they didn’t like either candidate. This time, she is pro-Biden: “I think that he is able to unite people.”

Elisabeth Foreman, 48, who works in billing at the warranty firm where her husband is a partner, told pollsters that Patrick Foreman was voting for Jo Jorgensen, the Libertaria­n candidate. In a follow-up interview, she said his choice frustrated her, because she felt that it was effectivel­y a vote for Trump.

“Maybe I don’t explain it very well, but he doesn’t see that,” she said. “We cannot sit down and have a conversati­on from beginning to end without someone getting upset.”

But in an interview with Patrick Foreman, 46, it turned out she had been more convincing than she realized. He said he now intended to vote for Biden.

“I struggled with that for a minute, and then realized a vote for Jorgensen is just a lost vote,” he said.

He credited, among other things, conversati­ons with his wife.

Political analysts talk about patterns among large groups of voters, like those who are suburban or Black or college educated. But influences inside homes can be even stronger, social scientists say. And when people feel strongly — as they’re more likely to in this election — they have more incentive to try to influence one another.

This could be one reason that couples are more likely to align politicall­y as they get older. Married couples older than 80 are significan­tly more likely to be in the same party as married couples younger than 30, the politicals­cience paper found.

“These people are cross-pressured, where people are voting different ways within the household and having these conversati­ons and gradually resolving the difference,” said Will Jordan, a Democratic pollster at the Global Strategy Group who has studied marital dynamics in voting.

That happened with Fatima Villegas and George Esparza of Las Vegas. They are both 28, and he plans to vote for the first time — partly because she persuaded him.

“He just did not believe in the government and just felt like your vote really had no power,” said Villegas, an office manager. “I’m very much proud of being able to be a citizen and be able to vote, and tried to bring that importance to him.”

They both plan to vote for Biden. She said his policies would improve the future for their daughter, who is 2. Of the Trump presidency, she said, “You can only cook so much in hell before you die.”

Politicall­y mismatched couples may be the best example that Democrats and Republican­s aren’t necessaril­y too polarized to relate. Battlegrou­nd neighborho­ods, where the number of Democrats and Republican­s are roughly equal, have the highest rate of households with politicall­y mixed marriages, the political science paper found. That suggests that in these places, the political climate may be more civil than people realize, Hersh said.

“When we construct an image of the other party at a distance, abstractly, we tend to construct someone who’s different on every dimension,” he said. “In spite of all the heightened rhetoric about Democrats and Republican­s hating each other, they really do have exposure to these people in their lives, in their homes and in their beds.”

 ?? Jessie Rieser / New York Times ?? Arizona residents Elisabeth and Patrick Foreman didn’t vote in 2016 because they didn’t like either candidate, but are now planning to vote for Joe Biden, the Democratic presidenti­al nominee.
Jessie Rieser / New York Times Arizona residents Elisabeth and Patrick Foreman didn’t vote in 2016 because they didn’t like either candidate, but are now planning to vote for Joe Biden, the Democratic presidenti­al nominee.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States