Houston Chronicle

Trump, in parting gift to Big Oil, reverses bird protection

- By Lisa Friedman

WASHINGTON — The Trump administra­tion gutted protection­s for migratory birds Tuesday, delivering the second of two parting gifts to the oil and gas industry, which has long sought to be shielded from liability for killing birds unintentio­nally in oil spills, toxic waste ponds and other environmen­tal disasters.

The move, by the Department of the Interior, came a day after the Environmen­tal Protection Agency finalized another regulation that had long been sought by fossil fuel companies and other major polluting industries: a measure that effectivel­y bars some scientific studies from considerat­ion when the agency is drafting public health rules.

The two regulation­s are among the last major environmen­tal rollbacks expected fromthe Trump administra­tion and will present an immediate challenge to the incoming Biden administra­tion, which has pledged to suspend and reverse many of the last-minute rules known as midnight regulation­s.

“These are definitely midnight regulation­s,” said Richard Revesz, an environmen­tal law professor at New York University. “They’re 11:59 and 59 seconds regulation­s.”

A senior official with the Biden transition team, speaking on background Tuesday in a briefing call with reporters, called the last-minute rollbacks an “unrelentin­g assault” on the environmen­t and said rebuilding federal agencies that the Trump administra­tion has gutted will be an enormous task.

“Oneway or another the most pernicious of these rules will end up getting undone,” Revesz said.

In the case of the bird rule, conservati­onists and oil industry executives alike have said that was precisely what the Trump administra­tion intended. The industry has long sought to be shielded from liability for killing birds unintentio­nally in oil spills, toxic waste ponds and other environmen­tal disasters.

Under the measure, which changes the way the 1918 Migratory Bird Treaty Act is implemente­d, the federal government will no longer fine or prosecute companies whose actions cause the death of birds, as long as killing birds was not the underlying intent of the action. That holds true for accidents like oil spills and electrocut­ions on power lines.

Accidental­ly killing birds is rarely prosecuted under the law, but there have been notable exceptions, like when the Obama administra­tion prosecuted seven oil companies in North Dakota for the deaths of 28 birds.

The Migratory Bird Treaty Act was part of the basis for a $100 million settlement with BP for the deaths of more than 1 million birds in the 2010 Deepwater Horizon spill. And, in 2009, Exxon Mobil paid $600,000 after pleading guilty in the deaths of protected owls, raptors and waterfowl that died in uncovered natural gas pits, oil tanks and wastewater facilities.

David Bernhardt, the interior secretary, described the new policy as a simple clarificat­ion of the law.

“This rule simply reaffirms the original meaning and intent of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act by making it clear that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will not prosecute landowners, industry and other individual­s for accidental­ly killing a migratory bird,” Bernhardt said in a statement.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States