Houston Chronicle

Oil regulator signals crackdown on flaring

State commission defers requests for firms using controvers­ial practice

- By Kevin Crowley and Rachel Adams-Heard

Texas’s energy regulator is taking an uncharacte­ristically critical approach toward burning off excess natural gas, a sign that growing pressure from environmen­talists and investors to curb the controvers­ial practice is paying off.

The Texas Railroad Commission on Tuesday deferred a series of applicatio­ns belonging to oil companies including Ovintiv Inc. One such request sought to flare more than $1 million worth of gas because it would be too expensive to build a pipeline to haul the fuel to markets, a claim the agency’s newest member said warranted “further investigat­ion.”

“Flaring is a necessary last resort during an upset, and we have work to do internally at the commission to ensure that we are not approving requests that go beyond that,” Jim Wright, one of three Republican commission­ers, said in a statement following the meeting.

The commission is at the center of criticism over the shale industry’s prolific flaring problem given the panel’s record of approving virtually every permit that comes before it. In the past, commission­ers have argued that more stringent regulation­s would have the effect of dis

couraging some oil production, thereby wasting the state’s natural resources. But a recent report by Rystad Energy found that 40 percent of future flaring could be avoided at no cost to oil companies.

During Tuesday’s meeting, both Wright and fellow Commission­er Wayne Christian spoke about routine flaring — industry jargon for burning that isn’t necessitat­ed by pipeline malfunctio­ns or other short-term events.

“For years the commission has been acting like this isn’t an issue, so it’s exciting to see that they now want to end routine flaring,” said Emma Pabst, a climate advocate for Environmen­t Texas. “They’re feeling the heat both from investors and environmen­talists alike.”

During flaring, most of the methane — a potent greenhouse gas — is eliminated from the gas stream, but the remaining emissions include carbon dioxide. While CO2 tends to be the focus of environmen­talists and some investors, the Railroad Commission views the issue as one relating to waste. Recently, the agency noted the need for policies that help make the shale industry more attractive to Wall Street.

“Getting an exception for our flaring rules should not be easy,” Christian said Tuesday. “Staff should ask tougher questions, follow-up questions and generally just dig deeper.”

It’s unclear whether the latest remarks by commission­ers signal an actual reduction in flaring permits is in the offing. At a previous meeting, Wright delayed decisions on several BP Plc permit applicatio­ns, which received approval Tuesday.

The London-based oil supermajor, which had previously called on the regulator to commit to ending routine flaring, was seeking permits to flare at 121 sites until April 2022. BP said last month that its request for permits was not inconsiste­nt with its longterm plan to reduce flaring.

 ?? Bronte Wittpenn / Bloomberg ?? Flaring, the process of burning off excess natural gas, is a controvers­ial practice that is a target of environmen­talists.
Bronte Wittpenn / Bloomberg Flaring, the process of burning off excess natural gas, is a controvers­ial practice that is a target of environmen­talists.
 ?? Fran Ruchalski / Staff ?? The Railroad Commission views the issue of flaring as one relating to waste.
Fran Ruchalski / Staff The Railroad Commission views the issue of flaring as one relating to waste.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States