Bristol-Myers, Sanofi must pay $834M over Plavix
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. and Sanofi were ordered to pay the state of Hawaii more than $834 million for illegally marketing their blockbuster blood-thinning drug Plavix in a manner that put some users’ lives at risk.
Judge Dean Ochiai in Honolulu concluded Monday the drugmakers misleadingly marketed Plavix and failed to properly warn consumers in the state about its health risks. The companies produce the medicine as part of a joint venture.
The $834 million was awarded as a civil penalty for BristolMyers Squibb and Sanofi’s violation of Hawaii’s consumer-protection laws through their improper Plavix marketing campaigns. Hawaii Attorney General Clare Connors’ lawyers showed the companies didn’t properly disclose the blood thinner was ineffective for as many as 30 percent of users in the state, the judge said.
In a 43-page ruling, Ochiai said Bristol-Myers’ and Sanofi’s deceptive marketing practices “knowingly placed Plavix patients at grave risk of serious injury or death in order to substantially increase their profits.” The judge concluded “the defendants were engaged in unfair and deceptive practices in Hawaii regarding Plavix” over a 12-year period starting in December 1998.
New York-based Bristol-Myers said both companies will appeal. “The court’s ruling is unsupported by the law and at odds with the evidence at trial,” it said in an emailed statement. “The overwhelming body of scientific evidence demonstrates that Plavix is a safe and effective therapy, including for people of Asian descent.”
A representative of Parisbased Sanofi didn’t immediately respond to an email seeking comment on Monday, a holiday in the United States. Lawyers for Hawaii also didn’t immediately respond to emails for comment.
Many of the people for whom Plavix didn’t work were of Asian or Pacific-Island decent, according to court filings. Some of those users didn’t properly metabolize the drug due to a genetic trait, the state said in its filings. During a four-week online trial last year, Hawaii’s lawyers argued that for poor drug metabolizers, Plavix may not have lowered the risk of a recurrent heart attack or stroke, as touted by BristolMyers and Sanofi.
“The court finds that defendants knew at the time of launch that there was a significant issue regarding diminished patient response to Plavix, particularly in those of non-Caucasian races” and “that for many years defendants deliberately turned a blind eye toward the problem out of concern that addressing it might adversely affect Plavix sales and defendants’ profits,” Ochiai wrote.
He noted the violations of Hawaii’s laws barring unfair or deceptive trade practices didn’t end until March 2010, when the companies added information about some users having problems metabolizing the drug to Plavix’s safety label.
The companies have been battling Plavix suits for more than a decade, persuading a federal judge in New Jersey — overseeing a consolidation of cases targeting the blood thinner — to dismiss the scientific basis for the suits as unreliable in 2018. The drugmakers continue to fight cases in state courts.