Houston Chronicle

Conservati­ves have own Green New Deal

- By Justin Louis Pitcock Pitcock, a U.S. Marine Corps veteran and member of the conservati­ve organizati­on Principles First, worked in the oil and gas industry and is a small business owner in Houston.

The Green New Deal proposed by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., gets a lot of attention from both parties. The prospect of such momentous legislatio­n excites climate activists and angers anti-big government groups. Of course, the deal outlined in House Resolution 109, where the Green New Deal was brought forth, is unrealisti­c and does not properly consider the negative consequenc­es it will impose. The goal of “meeting 100 percent of power demand” with zero-emission energy sources, for example, would raise challenges for reliabilit­y requiremen­ts, something on Texans’ minds more than ever after winter storm Uri. Look no farther than Germany, which is held as a model modern grid and still relies on carbon-based sources for onethird of its generation capacity because of its baseload all-weather reliabilit­y and lower cost.

The climate is changing, however, because of the greenhouse gasses we emit. Most major oil and gas companies agree. Many also agree there are responsibl­e measures we should take which will mitigate our impact on the climate without killing the jobs and industries that support our families and sacrificin­g reliabilit­y by moving too aggressive­ly to solar and wind before cost-effective battery technology catches up. Conservati­ves should approach this issue with the trademark clear thinking and conservati­on mindset that has served our country so well since Republican President Teddy Roosevelt popularize­d it.

One such approach is a win-win for Texan oil and gas and climate activists alike. There are more than 2 million unplugged, abandoned oil and gas wells in the United States which emit 100 times more methane than a plugged well. Texas currently allocates funds received from drilling permits for state-funded plugging efforts, but the number of abandoned wells is increasing. Federal dollars earmarked specifical­ly for this purpose would directly reduce fugitive methane emissions from abandoned wells, put oilfield hands to work on workover rigs supporting the effort, and increase property values by clearing land of old equipment.

Conservati­sm means getting the most bang for every tax buck. Federal dollars toward a nationwide plugging effort to reduce emissions, create jobs and increase property values are much better allocated than toward upgrading a serviceabl­e building with a more efficient one like the New York congresswo­men’s GND suggests we do

Another commonsens­e solution to provide reliable electricit­y generation and reduce emissions simultaneo­usly is simple: end the 30-plus year drought and build nuclear power plants again. Republican­s should champion nuclear power and seek to modernize the antiquated regulatory process to reflect new technologi­es. There are a half dozen U.S. companies introducin­g Small Nuclear Reactors, for example, which are much more cost-effective and quicker to build than a convention­al nuclear plant, emit no greenhouse gases, and provide power rain or shine to a more versatile set of end consumers.

Conservati­sm means reducing unnecessar­y regulation and promoting American technologi­cal advances while keeping public safety as the top priority. The added impact of reassertin­g our nuclear technical prowess on the world stage makes this effort even more imperative. Capable leadership seeking to proliferat­e safe nuclear power sources could lead a coalition across the aisle and make a real impact on these issues most Americans care about.

Conservati­ves across the country realize that power from wind, solar, hydro, geothermal and battery technology are critical parts of our future energy mix while maintainin­g that carbon sources, too, have an important role to play for years to come. It is prudent conservati­ve leadership to embrace the changing energy landscape while resisting efforts to let the pendulum swing toward heavy-handed central planning that eliminates industries with a myopic focus on emissions at the expense of livelihood­s and toward a myopic focus on emissions at the expense of grid reliabilit­y.

Plugging abandoned wells and rebuilding America’s nuclear capability are just two of many areas where Republican­s can offer conservati­ve solutions to the important issues we face. We can claim a conservati­ve Green New Deal of our own. It only requires a commitment to lay down our partisan swords and lead. Our country deserves leaders who will do so.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States