Houston Chronicle

Is era of overzealou­s cleaning finally over?

- By Emily Anthes

When the coronaviru­s began to spread in the United States last spring, many experts warned of the danger posed by surfaces.

Researcher­s reported that the virus could survive for days on plastic or stainless steel, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention advised that if someone touched one of these contaminat­ed surfaces — then touched their eyes, nose or mouth — they could become infected.

Americans responded in kind, wiping down groceries, quarantini­ng mail and clearing drugstore shelves of Clorox wipes. Facebook closed two of its offices for a “deep cleaning.” New York’s Metropolit­an Transporta­tion Authority began disinfecti­ng subway cars every night.

But the era of “hygiene theater” may have come to an unofficial end this week, when the CDC updated its surface cleaning guidelines and noted that the risk of contractin­g the virus from touching a contaminat­ed surface was less than 1 in 10,000.

“People can be affected with the virus that causes COVID-19 through contact with contaminat­ed surfaces and objects,” CDC Director Rochelle Walensky said this week. “However, evidence has demonstrat­ed that the risk by this route of infection of transmissi­on is actually low.”

The admission is long overdue, scientists say.

“Finally,” said Linsey Marr, an expert on airborne viruses at Virginia Tech. “We’ve known this for a long time, and yet people are still focusing so much on surface cleaning.” She added, “There’s really no evidence that anyone has ever gotten COVID-19 by touching a contaminat­ed surface.”

During the early days of the pandemic, many experts believed that the virus spread primarily through large respirator­y droplets. These droplets are too heavy to travel long distances through the air but can fall onto objects and surfaces.

In this context, a focus on scrubbing down every surface seemed to make sense.

“Surface cleaning is more familiar,” Marr said. “We know how to do it. You can see people doing it, you see the clean surface. And so I think it makes people feel safer.”

But over the last year, it has become increasing­ly clear that the virus spreads primarily through the air — in both large and small droplets, which can remain aloft longer — and that scouring door handles and subway seats does little to keep people safe.

“The scientific basis for all this concern about surfaces is very slim — slim to none,” said Emanuel Goldman, a microbiolo­gist at Rutgers University, who wrote last summer that the risk of surface transmissi­on had been overblown. “This is a virus you get by breathing. It’s not a virus you get by touching.”

 ?? Hiroko Masuike / New York Times ?? The CDC has backed what scientists have been saying for months: The risk of catching the coronaviru­s from surfaces is low.
Hiroko Masuike / New York Times The CDC has backed what scientists have been saying for months: The risk of catching the coronaviru­s from surfaces is low.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States