Houston Chronicle

Texas should adopt alternativ­es to STAAR

- By David DeMatthews DeMatthews is an associate professor in the Department of Educationa­l Leadership and Policy at the University of Texas at Austin.

The controvers­ial implementa­tion of this year’s STAAR exam amid the pandemic was interrupte­d recently by a glitch that caused Texas schools to delay the assessment. The state should now consider whether their significan­t financial investment­s have produced an improved assessment or an antiquated system that needs improvemen­ts.

Texas alone has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on standardiz­ed testing during the past few years. Despite all of this investment of taxpayer dollars, most standardiz­ed tests such as the State of Texas Assessment­s of Academic Readiness look almost exactly as they did 50 years ago — paperbased and multiple choice questions. Texas is shifting to computer-based assessment­s over the next few years, but that does not necessaril­y mean the test will be more responsive to context or useful for teachers.

The STAAR is also limited in its responsive­ness to Texas demographi­cs. State assessment­s created by testing companies are produced for large population­s of students. However, such tests are not individual­ized by state, region, shifting demographi­cs or the many

cultural identities and experience­s of students.

Surely, most Texans would agree that this is not California and would like a Texas-centric test. State policymake­rs should not leave a flawed test in place to prop up a system of accountabi­lity. Texas is a large state that should leverage its bargaining power with testing companies to make significan­t improvemen­ts to the STAAR exam.

Lawmakers would be wise to be concerned too because schools serving higher proportion­s of students of color and immigrant students may find more of their students struggling to make sense of test questions.

Federal requiremen­ts contribute to the production of outdated tests, because assessment­s must

be fragmented into core subject areas. Assessing a student’s ability to read, write and calculate is important, but families and educators also care deeply about other schooling outcomes that could be tested, such as students’ critical thinking, scientific literacy, civic engagement and ability to integrate knowledge from multiple subject areas.

Perhaps current investment­s would be worth it if teachers could quickly gain insights into student areas of growth. Unfortunat­ely, whether STAAR is taken on a computer or on paper, test results do not reach teachers for months. Any data that might be actionable is, at best, outdated or, at worst, irrelevant.

The STAAR exam’s shortcomin­gs come along with additional unintended consequenc­es — student anxiety, teaching to the test, time lost to test preparatio­n and benchmarki­ng and uninspirin­g working conditions for teachers and principals. To make matters worse, two decades of state accountabi­lity using standardiz­ed tests have not led to any closure of achievemen­t gaps between lowincome students and their affluent peers.

State policymake­rs should demand an assessment that uses innovative testing approaches and can be immediatel­y useful to teachers. Moving forward, assessment­s should be computer-based and adaptive — which means that computers automatica­lly adjust the difficultl­y of questions based on students’ prior answers. Adaptive assessment­s can provide teachers with immediate insights into each student’s misconcept­ions. Then, teachers can reteach or share informatio­n with families so they can work together.

Adaptive tests are already offered in many districts in Texas through NWEA’s Measures of Academic Progress. Adaptive tests can be shorter, given multiple times per year, and detached from any high stakes. They are especially beneficial as schools seek to restart after closures.

Texas could also adopt performanc­e-based tests that are cross-disciplina­ry and assess more complex tasks than traditiona­l standardiz­ed assessment­s. For example, Stanford University researcher­s have promoted performanc­e assessment­s in science that emphasize students revisiting and deepening their understand­ing of core concepts across grades and discipline­s. These tests assess critical thinking and interdisci­plinary skills that students will need in a Texas economy that is increasing­ly drawing in high-tech jobs.

The current system of testing in Texas is outdated, costly, does not produce timely and actionable data and has not led to improved outcomes. Texas can and should be a national leader in ensuring students receive state-ofthe-art tests that aid schools, teachers and families in supporting ambitious learning outcomes for students.

 ?? Jason Fochtman / Staff file photo ?? The author says current testing is outdated, costly and does not produce timely and actionable data.
Jason Fochtman / Staff file photo The author says current testing is outdated, costly and does not produce timely and actionable data.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States