Sex harassment victims bear fiscal burden

While it’s long been clear that victims of sexual harassment often face retaliation that can damage their careers, the financial cost they shoulder has been difficult to quantify.

To put a number on it, a study published Wednesday by Time’s Up and the Institute for Women’s Policy Research (IWPR), “Paying Today and Tomorrow,” sought to nail down what people who had been harassed ended up paying. Victims interviewed faced expenses anywhere from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars.

For one woman working in the well-paid, maledominated construction industry, the lifetime cost could reach $1.3 million, according to the study. Even someone forced out of a low-wage job like those in the fast-food industry saw financial fallout totaling $125,600.

Workers who took part in the study came from a variety of industries — from technology to trucking to janitorial services. Almost everyone said they lost some work or were forced out of their jobs altogether. Most lost responsibilities and pay as retaliation for speaking up — they were docked hours, given poor performance evaluations, or denied bonuses and promotions until they were pushed out or fired. Some remained unemployed for as long as five years.

Many changed careers, starting back at the bottom in jobs that paid much less than what they left behind, according to the study. For a few, it meant spending even more money on retraining or tuition. Meanwhile,

all suffered from lost wages, lost health benefits and depleted retirement savings as debts piled up.

When the #MeToo movement began in earnest in 2018, “we had all these women sharing their stories,” said C. Nicole Mason, president of IWPR. But, “we had very little research or data about what does this mean for women’s economic mobility, security, career mobility.”

Data can be hard to come by. Settlements often come with nondisclosure agreements, and the government doesn’t require businesses to report whether women are leaving due to harassment. “We took it as a personal charge to try to quantify this,” Mason said.

The case of Marlene is a prime illustration of what can happen. Asking to be identified by only her first name due to ongoing litigation, Marlene said colleagues at the agency where she worked warned she had been promoted for the wrong reasons. According to a lawsuit she filed in May, Marlene soon discovered what they meant.

Two months after starting her new job as executive assistant, she alleged that her supervisor started making comments about her appearance and personal life. Then he began leaving small gifts with hand-written cards in her office at night, she said.

But when Marlene told him she wasn’t interested, everything changed; he started sending emails demanding more work. When she complained, Marlene found herself relieved of duties while her supervisor was promoted, according to her complaint.

Marlene said she concluded she had no future at the agency, and quit. She obtained a right-to-sue letter from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and did so in state court. Years later, Marlene says she has yet to make the kind of money she earned at her old job.

Marlene’s allegations are the sort many companies seek to avoid with robust training and warnings to would-be harassers. But even now, the IWPR says, at least one-quarter of women still experience sexual harassment at work. The financial consequences factor into the gender wage gap that leaves them earning 82 cents for every dollar a man makes.

Men can be harassed as well. Anthoné Gerenis, who in 2019 filed a complaint with the EEOC, said he started working at a real estate company in Gainesville,

Fla., at 19. Within two years, he worked his way up to company headquarters-in human resources.

Within a month of starting his new role, Gerenis alleged that a more senior colleague had made unwanted advances. I felt “pure terror,” Gerenis said, because he “had my entire life in his hands.” When Gerenis rebuffed his advances, he was stripped of responsibilities and fired, according to his EEOC filing.

Gerenis said he lost his health insurance and eventually burned through his savings. “I went from having a $103,000 compensation package to applying for food stamps,” he said. “Everything I’ve lost — now you’re talking hundreds of thousands of dollars.”

While he’s tried to find other work, Gerenis said he feels as if he’s been blacklisted.