Dems told to nix proposals on migrants from social bill
WASHINGTON — Democrats must drop from their expansive social and environment bill an effort to let millions of immigrants remain temporarily in the U.S., the Senate parliamentarian decided Thursday, dealing the latest blow to a longtime party priority.
The opinion by Elizabeth MacDonough, the Senate’s nonpartisan arbiter of its rules, all but certainly means Democrats will ultimately have to pull the proposal from their 10-year, roughly $2 trillion package. The bill carries health care, family services and climate change initiatives that are top priorities for President Joe Biden. They would mostly paid for by higher taxes on corporations and the rich.
When the Senate considers the overall legislation, which is currently stalled, Democrats are expected to try reviving the immigration provisions or perhaps even stronger language giving migrants a way to become permanent residents or citizens. But such efforts would face solid opposition from Republicans and probably a small number of Democrats, which would be enough for defeat in the 50-50 chamber.
MacDonough’s opinion was no surprise — it was the third time since September that she said Democrats would violate Senate rules by using the legislation to help immigrants and should remove immigration provisions from the bill.
MacDonough’s finding was the second defeat of the day inflicted on Democrats’ social and economic package. Biden was also forced to concede that Senate work on the massive overall bill would be delayed until at least January after his negotiations stalled with holdout Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., who wants to further cut and reshape the legislation.
“We will advance this work together over the days and weeks ahead,” the president said in a statement.
Democrats’ latest immigration proposal would have let an estimated 6.5 million immigrants in the U.S. since at least 2010 without legal authorization apply for up to two five-year work permits. The permits would let them hold jobs, avoid deportation and in some instances travel abroad without risking their residency here. Applicants would have to meet background checks and other requirements.
Immigration advocates and their Democratic Senate allies have said they will continue seeking a way to include provisions helping migrants in the legislation, but their pathway is unclear.
“Disappointed. And we’re considering what options remain,” said Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin, D-Ill.
Democrats are using special rules that would let them push the bill through the Senate by a simple majority vote, not the 60 votes that legislation usually needs. GOP opposition means the immigration provisions Democrats want would not survive as a freestanding bill.
But under those same rules, such bills can’t be driven more by policy changes than by cuts or increases in the budget.
The parliamentarian makes that call. MacDonough’s opinion said Democrats had failed that test because the disputed language would have changed a program that currently awards work permits sparingly into one where it would be mandatory to issue the permits to migrants who qualify.
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the bill’s immigration provisions would end up costing the government around $111 billion over 10 years, largely because of federal benefits immigrants would qualify for by gaining legal status.
The rejected plan would have created no new pathway for those getting work permits to remain in the U.S. permanently. But the budget office estimated last month that of 6.5 million migrants who would ultimately get the temporary permits, around 3 million would later gain permanent residency because their new status would remove some obstacles in that process.