Houston Chronicle

The myth of Russia’s military lies shattered

Max Boot says Texas’ junior senator and other right-wingers now look foolish for being fooled and deifying Putin as a ‘genius.’

- Boot is a Washington Post columnist, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and the author of “The Road Not Taken: Edward Lansdale and the American Tragedy in Vietnam.”

In recent years, many on the American right have deified Vladimir Putin as a “genius” and his armed forces as invincible conquerors because they are not burdened by Western liberal pieties.

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, typified the trend last year when he linked to a TikTok video showing a muscular Russian soldier doing pushups, parachutin­g out of an airplane and using a rifle.

Cruz contrasted this Kremlin propaganda unfavorabl­y with a U.S. Army recruiting video featuring a female corporal who was raised by two mothers.

“Holy crap,” Cruz tweeted: “Perhaps a woke, emasculate­d military is not the best idea …” He went on to blame “Dem politician­s & woke media” for trying to turn U.S. troops “into pansies.”

Well, how do you like the Russian military now, senator? The internet is full of videos showing Russian troops running out of fuel and food in Ukraine, weeping after surrenderi­ng, and complainin­g that they are being used as “cannon fodder.” There are reports of Russian soldiers sabotaging their own vehicles rather than fight in a war they want no part of. The Russians are even leaving their dead on the battlefiel­d — a shocking thing to see for U.S. soldiers, whose creed contains the line, “I will never leave a fallen comrade.”

I have spent decades covering the U.S. military, including numerous visits to Iraq and Afghanista­n, and the lack of competence and morale displayed by the Russian military is simply impossible to imagine on the part of U.S. troops.

U.S. personnel are far better equipped, trained, motivated and led than their Russian counterpar­ts. It’s not even close. If the Russian military were ever to face the U.S. military in battle — something that we must fervently hope will never happen because of the presence of nuclear weapons on both sides — I doubt the Russians would last any longer than the Iraqi army (which was trained and equipped along Soviet lines) did in 1991 and 2003. Indeed, in 2018, U.S. air power pulverized Russian mercenarie­s who attacked a U.S. outpost in Syria: The U.S. troops suffered no casualties while the attackers lost 200 to 300 men.

Cruz and other Republican­s who glorified the Russian armed forces are dupes — “useful idiots,” the communists called them — who did Putin’s bidding by enhancing the Russian dictator’s aura of power. To be sure, we still don’t know the outcome of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. It’s quite possible that, despite early setbacks, the Russians could still pound Ukrainian cities into rubble and claim at least a temporary victory. But one outcome is already clear: The myth of Russian military power has been shattered.

There has been much talk in recent years about Putin’s rebuild of the Russian armed forces, which included changing it from a mostly conscript to a mostly volunteer force and equipping it with high-tech weapons systems, such as cruise missiles. The buildup appeared to pay off during earlier interventi­ons in Georgia, Ukraine and Syria. But it is now obvious that those forays gave a highly deceptive image of Russian capabiliti­es. Putin’s “little green men” quickly took over Crimea in 2014, largely because they had the support of the local Russian-speaking population. His air force was able to bomb Syrian cities with ease because the rebels didn’t have antiaircra­ft missiles.

That is a very different task from invading and occupying a country of more than 43 million people with a battle-hardened military equipped with Western-supplied weapons and backed by a large citizen militia. The invasion of Ukraine is laying bare all the corruption, inefficien­cy and incompeten­ce of the Russian military machine, which is all too reminiscen­t of the old Red Army.

As one retired U.S. general quipped, the Russians may have been trying to emulate U.S. “shock and awe” tactics from 2003, but their efforts are more like “shock and yawn.” The Russians have proved utterly incapable of coordinati­ng air and ground operations or keeping troops supplied on the march. They can’t even maintain truck tires. A week into the war, the Russians still haven’t establishe­d control of the skies — something that the United States routinely does in the early hours of its wars. Analysts are wondering what happened to the Russian air force. Russia has a lot more aircraft than Ukraine, yet Russian ground troops have often been left to attack without air cover. The Russians fired fewer missiles in the first six days of the war than the U.S. did in the first night of Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2003.

At least 2,000 Russian soldiers have already been killed — and likely a great deal more. That’s almost as many as the United States lost in 20 years in Afghanista­n. A retired Australian general commented that the early days of the invasion are indicative “of profession­ally corrupt and incompeten­t military leaders who are literally throwing away the lives of their soldiers.”

It’s still possible, of course, that the Russians could bombard Ukraine into submission. Never underestim­ate Putin’s barbarism. But it’s doubtful that Putin can ever extinguish Ukrainian resistance — or resurrect the myth of Russian military competence. American right-wingers such as Cruz look foolish for being fooled by Russia’s Potemkin village armed forces. I’ll take our “woke military” any day.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States