Houston Chronicle

Targeting appeal among proposals

- By Ralph D. Russo

Players ejected for targeting in the second half of a college football game could be eligible to play the following game after an appeal through the conference office, if a recommenda­tion handed down Friday by the NCAA rules committee is approved.

After four days of meetings in Indianapol­is, the committee also recommende­d penalizing all open-field blocks below the waist and creating an investigat­ion process for allegation­s of a team faking injuries that could lead to conference­s penalizing schools and coaches.

Recommenda­tions need approval from the playing rules oversight panel in April and would go into effect next season.

The committee discussed changing how the game clock is managed to shorten games by both time and number of plays, but decided not to act.

The average FBS game was 3 hours, 28 minutes last season and included about 137 offensive plays.

Shaving time and plays out of college football games has become a discussion point recently as conference commission­ers considered possibly expanding the playoff, a move that could increase the maximum length of a season to 16 or even 17 games for a few teams.

Attempts to expand the College Football Playoff to 12 teams by the 2024 season failed and the soonest a new format would be implemente­d now is 2026.

National coordinato­r of officials Steve Shaw said the number of players per game has plateaued over the last six seasons after a slight decrease.

“But we have talked about at some point do we need to address this if the season does get longer because it is a longer playoff,” said Stanford coach David Shaw, the rules committee chairman.

The rules committee has been looking at ways to discourage the faking of injuries, mostly by defensive players to slow down uptempo offenses, for several years.

Steve Shaw said the committee remains apprehensi­ve to implement in-game alteration­s. The concern is a rule requiring players who are treated on the field to miss the remainder of an offensive possession would incentiviz­e players who are actually hurt to play through an injury.

“So now for questionab­le game action, the institutio­n or the conference can consult the national coordinato­r of officials to facilitate a video review. And if there are findings that will now go back to the conference office, and the conference office will deal with the institutio­n, the coach, to get that corrected,” Steve Shaw said.

Suggested punishment­s were not recommende­d, but David Shaw said he would prefer coaches face “severe penalties“for coaching players to feign injuries.

“This is one of those things that is getting taught that is unethical,” David Shaw said. “So as best we can to drive this out, hopefully, we’ll get some partnershi­p from conference officials, conference commission­ers, leaning on some of these coaches that are teaching things unethical.”

The targeting foul has been a constant point of contention among coaches, players and fans, but there has been no serious movement toward changing it. Targeting, implemente­d in its current form in 2008, results in a 15-yard penalty, plus the ejection of the flagged player.

Players ejected in the first half of a game do not have to miss the following game. Players ejected at any point in the second half are required to sit out the first half of the following game.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States