Houston Chronicle

Officials: Intelligen­ce suggests pro-Ukrainian group sabotaged pipelines

- By Adam Entous, Julian E. Barnes and Adam Goldman

WASHINGTON — New intelligen­ce reviewed by U.S. officials suggests that a pro-Ukrainian group carried out the attack on the Nord Stream pipelines last year, a step toward determinin­g responsibi­lity for an act of sabotage that has confounded investigat­ors on both sides of the Atlantic for months.

U.S. officials said that they had no evidence President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine or his top lieutenant­s were involved in the operation, or that the perpetrato­rs were acting at the direction of any Ukrainian government officials.

The brazen attack on the natural gas pipelines, which link Russia to Western Europe, fueled public speculatio­n about who was to blame, from Moscow to Kyiv and London to Washington, and it has remained one of the most consequent­ial unsolved mysteries of Russia’s year-old war in Ukraine.

Ukraine and its allies have been seen by some officials as having the most logical potential motive to attack the pipelines. They have opposed the project for years, calling it a national security threat because it would allow Russia to sell gas more easily to Europe.

Ukrainian government and military intelligen­ce officials say they had no role in the attack and do not know who carried it out. After this article was published, Mykhailo Podolyak, a senior adviser to Zelenskyy, posted on Twitter that Ukraine “has nothing to do with the Baltic Sea mishap.” He added that he had no informatio­n about pro-Ukrainian “sabotage groups.”

U.S. officials said there was much they did not know about the perpetrato­rs and their affiliatio­ns. The review of newly collected intelligen­ce suggests they were opponents of President Vladimir Putin of Russia, but does not specify the members of the group, or who directed or paid for the operation. U.S. officials declined to disclose the nature of the intelligen­ce, how it was obtained or any details of the strength of the evidence it contains. They have said there are no firm conclusion­s about it, leaving open the possibilit­y that the operation might have been conducted off the books by a proxy force with connection­s to the Ukrainian government or its security services.

Some initial U.S. and European speculatio­n centered on possible Russian culpabilit­y, especially given its prowess in undersea operations, although it is unclear what motivation the Kremlin would have in sabotaging the pipelines given that they

have been an important source of revenue and a means for Russia to exert influence over Europe. One estimate put the cost of repairing the pipelines starting at about $500 million. U.S. officials say they have not found any evidence of involvemen­t by the Russian government in the attack.

Officials who have reviewed the intelligen­ce said they believed the saboteurs were most likely Ukrainian or Russian nationals, or some combinatio­n of the two. U.S. officials said no American or British nationals were involved.

The pipelines were ripped apart by deep sea explosions in September, in what U.S. officials described at the time as an act of sabotage. European officials have publicly said they believe the operation that targeted Nord Stream was probably state sponsored, possibly because of the sophistica­tion with which the perpetrato­rs planted and detonated the explosives on the floor of the Baltic Sea without being detected. U.S. officials have not stated publicly that they believe the operation was sponsored by a state.

The explosives were most likely planted with the help of experience­d divers who did not appear to be working for military or intelligen­ce services, U.S. officials who have reviewed the new intelligen­ce said.

Officials said there were still enormous gaps in what U.S. spy agencies and their European partners knew about what transpired. But officials said it might constitute the first significan­t lead to emerge from several closely guarded investigat­ions, the conclusion­s of which could have profound implicatio­ns for the coalition supporting Ukraine.

Any suggestion of Ukrainian involvemen­t, whether direct or indirect, could upset the delicate relationsh­ip between Ukraine and Germany, souring support among a German public that has swallowed high energy prices in the name of solidarity.

 ?? New York Times file photo ?? New intelligen­ce reporting amounts to the first significan­t known lead about who was responsibl­e for the attack on the Nord Stream pipelines that carried natural gas from Russia to Europe.
New York Times file photo New intelligen­ce reporting amounts to the first significan­t known lead about who was responsibl­e for the attack on the Nord Stream pipelines that carried natural gas from Russia to Europe.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States