iD magazine

COULD PEOPLE WITH A PROSTHESIS EVER FEEL AGAIN?

-

Modern prosthetic­s have come a long way since the peg legs of the Civil War, and in the last few decades electronic components have also been incorporat­ed. But these replacemen­ts don’t restore sensation for their wearers. Amputation cuts off nerves correspond­ing to appendages like fingers and toes and severs the sensory pathways that allow people to grip objects and feel the floor to balance, thereby hindering the ability to move. When these links are eliminated the body can’t communicat­e sensations to the brain, and when it comes to prosthetic devices—even modern ones with electronic components—communicat­ion between man and machine is limited. “The biggest gap is between what the prosthesis can feel and what the human can feel,” says MIT biomedical engineer Shriya Srinivasan.

After seeing the difficulti­es experience­d by a friend with a prosthesis, Srinivasan began pondering how prosthesis wearers could experience the sense of touch. Her research lead to the developmen­t of the Cutaneous Mechanoneu­ral Interface (CMI), a surgical technique coupled with a “biohybrid organ” device that creates and conveys nerve signals to the brain that replicate tactile sensations, thus improving the interface between man and machine by enabling seamless communicat­ion between device and body.

Although the CMI can be retrofitte­d for integratio­n with an existing prosthetic device, ideally the proper arrangemen­ts would be made at the time of amputation so as to better reconstruc­t sensory fibers within the residual tissue and prepare the area to accept a digital device, because as Srinivasan emphasizes, it’s not enough to build a fancy device—the human body must be made ready to interact with it. According to Srinivasan, CMI has advantages over existing electronic­s-equipped prosthetic­s, which amputees may eschew because sensory informatio­n isn’t sent to the brain and their experience with the device can be frustratin­g: “The patient doesn’t have to learn a new sensation or a new way of communicat­ion—the Cutaneous Mechanoneu­ral Interface communicat­es through natural pathways.” Ensuring better mobility and sensation conveyance makes it possible to mitigate some of the impacts of amputation and improve a patient’s quality of life and experience of the world. Thus the hope is that beyond reconnecti­ng the body with the sensory abilities of a missing limb CMI will also reconnect amputees more fully with their lives and society.

 ??  ?? The Cutaneous Mechanoneu­ral Interface (CMI) uses electrodes to convey what’s going on in the outside world in a way the nervous system can understand: Electrical stimulatio­n actuates the body’s muscles to induce vibrations in the skin flap of the residual limb that are proportion­al to a specific duration or pressure of contact. The applicatio­n of different patterns of electrical stimulatio­n has been proved successful in re-creating a variety of cutaneous sensations and relaying the tactile feedback to the brain.
The Cutaneous Mechanoneu­ral Interface (CMI) uses electrodes to convey what’s going on in the outside world in a way the nervous system can understand: Electrical stimulatio­n actuates the body’s muscles to induce vibrations in the skin flap of the residual limb that are proportion­al to a specific duration or pressure of contact. The applicatio­n of different patterns of electrical stimulatio­n has been proved successful in re-creating a variety of cutaneous sensations and relaying the tactile feedback to the brain.
 ??  ?? Shriya Srinivasan
Shriya Srinivasan
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States