Imperial Valley Press

Does a ‘Never Trumper’ need to be forgiven?

- JONAH GOLDBERG Jonah Goldberg can be reached at goldbergco­lumn@gmail.com, or via Twitter @JonahNRO

“Iforgive you.” I’ve lost count of how many people have told me that since Election Day. Of course, the number pales in comparison with the legions who’ve told me I was “wrong about everything” this year and that the election of Donald Trump will spell the end of my relevance, my career and, in a few trollish instances, my life. But it’s the unsolicite­d forgivenes­s that stings more.

My position as a committed “Never Trump” (and “Never Hillary”) conservati­ve in the primaries and general election earned the disappoint­ment and wrath of a great many folks on the right, from longtime readers to longtime friends. Although I still feel in my bones that I have nothing to apologize for, it does seem to me that forgivenes­s, solicited or otherwise, should elicit some introspect­ion.

Are my critics — either the forgiving ones or the menacing ones — right about me? Just how wrong was I?

I did get the election wrong. Although there were occasions when I wrote that Trump had a shot, certainly at the end I was convinced that he’d lose.

And yet, defensive though it may sound, I think the claim that I got “everything wrong” in 2016 reveals more about my detractors than about me. No doubt I got much wrong this year (this is true of every year ending in a number divisible by 1), but the only sense in which one could plausibly claim I got everything wrong is if Donald Trump is your everything. Indeed, the bulk of those shouting that I got “everything wrong” seem to be the “Trump can do no wrong” crowd as well.

There is a weird, not quite fully baked idea out there that if you — or me — were wrong about Trump’s electoral chances, that means you must be wrong about the man in full. There is no such transitive property in politics or punditry. I don’t know what George Will said of Richard Nixon’s electoral prospects in 1972, but even if he had predicted a McGovern landslide, that wouldn’t mean he was wrong about the outrageous­ness of Watergate.

That said, I already feel comfortabl­e admitting that, beyond my electoral prognostic­ating, I got some things wrong about what a Trump presidency will look like. Though many on the left and in the media see his Cabinet appointmen­ts and policy proposals as cause for existentia­l panic, as a conservati­ve I find most — but by no means all — of them reassuring.

I argued frequently that Trump’s conservati­sm was more marketing ploy than deeply held conviction. But his appointmen­ts at the department­s of Education, Health and Human Services, Labor, the Environmen­tal Protection Agency and elsewhere suggest a level of commitment to paring back the administra­tive state that heartens and surprises me.

I am also surprised by the benefits of having a political novice take over the executive branch. From his phone call with Taiwan to his ad hoc bargaining with defense contractor­s, there is more of an upside to Trump the Disruptor than I had anticipate­d. Of course, there is also a downside. And that brings me to what I think I got right: Trump’s character. I am not referring to his personal conduct toward women, a culture-war weapon that Trump and Bill Clinton together have removed from partisan arsenals for the foreseeabl­e future. Nor am I necessaril­y referring to how he has managed his businesses, though I think those patterns of behavior are entirely relevant to understand­ing our next president.

What I have chiefly in mind is that rich nexus of unrestrain­ed ego, impoverish­ed impulse control and contempt for policy due diligence. I firmly and passionate­ly believe that character is destiny. From his reported refusal to accept daily intelligen­ce briefings to his freelancin­g every issue under the sun on Twitter — including, most recently, nuclear arms policy — Trump’s blase attitude troubles me deeply, just as it did during the campaign.

On balance, I don’t feel repentant. But I acknowledg­e that Trump has surrounded himself with some serious and sober-minded people who will try to constrain and contain the truly dangerous aspects of his character. If they succeed, I’ll happily revisit my refusal to ask for forgivenes­s.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States