Imperial Valley Press

Virginia governor’s race is the establishm­ent’s revenge

- MICHAEL SHANNON Michael Shannon can be reached at mandate.mmpr@gmail.com

November’s off–year Virginia governor’s race is what conservati­ves would have faced in 2016 if Trump had done a Hillary as he descended the escalator for his announceme­nt and wound up in A Place for Mom instead of the Oval Office.

Our nominee would have been a bland, white, country club Republican who talked lukewarm Tea Party. A nominee that would have looked just like “Establishm­ent Ed” Gillespie, the caretaker conservati­ve running as the Republican in Virginia. These off–year elections are supposed to send a message to Washington and specifical­ly the White House. If a Democrat wins nationally and Virginia elects a Republican the following year, the result is supposed to mean voters are angry because Democrats went too far.

Conservati­ve voters dissatisfi­ed with the nominee are given a binary choice by party leadership: Hold your nose and support some housebroke­n Republican or be personally responsibl­e for electing the Democrat.

This hobbling choice is not limited to Virginia. Conservati­ves nationwide regularly confront this dilemma as yet another cocktail conservati­ve holds their vote hostage to the Democrat alternativ­e.

After years of just following orders, my nose is as pinched as Ichabod Crane’s and I’m tired of it. This year, instead of sending a message to the White House, where one of the Javanka twins would no doubt intercept it, I want to move the targeting solution about 3 miles from Pennsylvan­ia Avenue to the Republican National Committee. Instead of an interparty message, I want conservati­ves to deliver an intraparty message.

Ed Gillespie is a perfect example of a candidate that feels genuine conservati­ves are good enough to help him win, but not good enough to influence policy once he’s in office. It would have been difficult to find a candidate more out–of–step with the conservati­ves than Establishm­ent Ed. The National Review recently endorsed Gillespie and they unintentio­nally damned him with faint praise. According to those Never Trumpers, Ed deserves our vote because:

He joined the Bush White House when George W. was low on friends

A Gillespie win will send a message

Ed wants to cut taxes

Gillespie wants someone to open more charter schools

Big deal. For conservati­ves, the most important issue in Virginia is transporta­tion: Base voters want new roads for a speedy trip into work and new enforcemen­t for a speedy trip back to Central America for illegals.

Naturally, Enervating Ed is on the wrong side of both parts. He doesn’t mention roads and Giveaway Gillespie supported the failed Gang of Eight bill. He’s part of the Delusion Caucus that’s convinced surrenderi­ng to Democrat demands to import more voters will somehow result in GOP victories. As befits a former lobbyist who made a living torturing innocent words, Gillespie assures conservati­ves he didn’t support “amnesty” for illegals, he only supports “legalizati­on.”

So, let me explain to Gillespie - who only speaks conservati­ve–as–a–second–language — any result allowing illegal aliens to remain in the US is AMNESTY, regardless of how you try to focus group your way out of it. Ed’s idea of tough–minded leadership on illegals is keeping a lid on how many other benefits the piñata holds.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States