Imperial Valley Press

How California candidates use three words to sway voters

- BY BEN CHRISTOPHE­R

When California­ns step into their voting booths on Election Day — finally shut off from the daily deluge of campaign ads — every candidate will still have at least one last word. And a maximum of three.

Right on the ballot, just below his or her name, California law affords each person running for office a designatio­n. Like an ultra-pithy, last-minute advertisem­ent, this short biographic­al descriptio­n gives candidates an opportunit­y to tell voters just a little bit more.

For those who don’t know that Gavin Newsom is the lieutenant governor, for example, they’ll find out on the ballot, along with the fact that he’s a “businessma­n.”

Likewise, voters in one Assembly district may learn that their assemblyma­n, Heath Flora, also moonlights as a farmer and a firefighte­r, according to his designatio­n.

And voters across the state will find a “retired steam engineer” running for treasurer, a “puppeteer/musician” for governor and an ocean of small-business owners, doctors and teachers.

People say first impression­s are everything, but in California politics, sometimes the last impression matters most.

“A lot of thought and debate goes into this every two years,” said Dave Gilliard, a Republican political consultant. Thought, debate, public-opinion research and, when all else fails, litigation.

Voters may be guided by a rational assessment of each candidate’s stances on a constellat­ion of public-policy issues. But sometimes trivial details can be decisive.

Party designatio­n, name recognitio­n and even the order of names on the ballot have all been shown to influence electoral outcomes.

So in what has become a venerable California tradition, the spring before every election is lawsuit season.

Candidates sue to block ballot designatio­ns that may bend the rules and might give their rivals a competitiv­e edge.

This year, the California Secretary of State’s office has been party to at least eight lawsuits related to ballot designatio­ns, and the recipient of an untold number of written complaints.

In a crowded inland Orange County congressio­nal district, where 17 candidates are competing to replace retiring Republican Rep. Ed Royce, front-runner Gil Cisneros (“education/veterans advocate”) brought a suit forcing a fellow Democrat, Sam Jammal, to change his designatio­n from “civil rights attorney” to “clean energy businessma­n.”

State law requires candidates to list their current job, or one they held within the last year. Jammal had practiced voting-rights law until the late 2000s, but most recently he worked as an attorney for SolarCity, a solar-energy company.

In another Orange County district, this one along the coast, the state forced Republican Assemblyma­n Rocky Chávez to switch his designatio­n from “retired Marine colonel” to “Assemblyme­mber” after a Marine veteran in the district filed a complaint. Chavez, who is described on his campaign website as “one tough Marine,” retired from the corps in 2001. He is running to succeed Rep. Darrell Issa, who is not running again.

And in a district stretching east and south of Sacramento, into the Sierra Nevada, a judge stripped Democratic candidate Jessica Morse of her chosen designatio­n, “national security strategist,” after Regina Bateson, another Democrat in the race, sued. When the judge also deemed Morse’s two alternativ­e choices inadmissib­le, the candidate opted to be on the ballot without any designatio­n at all.

“Some people will say this is nitpicking,” said Bateson, an M.I.T. political science professor who will be listed as a “military security analyst.” “The issue here is that I think the rule of law matters. Everyone running for office in California is expected to abide by the same set of laws.”

Morse has worked for both the U.S. Agency for Internatio­nal Developmen­t and the State Department, but not since 2015.

“Jessica Morse is proud of her years of service in national security, working on behalf of our country at home and abroad, including Iraq,” said Makaiah Mohler, deputy campaign manager for Morse. “We are disappoint­ed to see another campaign resorting to petty political games.”

Morse will not be the only candidate without a designatio­n beneath her name this year. There are 19 others, running for congressio­nal, state legislativ­e and statewide office. But she is by far the highest profile.

This year, she has outraised her Republican opponent, GOP Congressma­n Tom McClintock, and in February, she won the endorsemen­t of the state Democratic Party. How she fares in the June 7 primary may provide an answer to the question: Are these three words on the ballot really worth all the fuss?

In high-profile races, where most people enter the voting booth with an opinion about the various candidates, the answer is probably not.

But virtually every other contest aside from the presidenti­al race is a “low-informatio­n election,” says Jessica Levinson, a professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles.

So far, that even includes this year’s governor’s race. According to a recent survey by the Public Policy Institute of California, only a little more than half of likely voters — the subset of the population presumed to be most engaged — are paying either “very” or “fairly” close attention to the gubernator­ial contest.

“A critical mass of people do not encounter their candidates until they get their ballot,” said Levinson. “So what they’re looking at is just what’s on the ballot, and that is: Which party do you prefer, how do you describe yourself and what’s your name?”

And particular­ly in crowded primaries, or in non-partisan races where voters can’t simply vote on a party line, an unknown “nurse” will probably beat out the anonymous “marketing consultant” every time, said Brian Hildreth, an election lawyer at the Sacramento firm Bell, McAndrews & Hiltachk who has helped candidates challenge their rivals’ ballot designatio­ns.

“When you get down to county supervisor, when you get down to auditor, or even to member of the Assembly or member of the state Senate, ... they might look to someone who is a ‘teacher’ or an ‘educator’ or a ‘taxpayer advocate,’” he said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States