Imperial Valley Press

National Climate Assessment a political hot potato

- BLAIR BESS Blair Bess is an award-winning journalist and columnist. He can be reached at bbess@soaggragat­ed.com

Timing is everything. Take for example the Trump administra­tion’s decision to release the latest National Climate Assessment during last month’s Thanksgivi­ng holiday. No shocker. The president and his team consistent­ly dump unwelcome informatio­n at times they believe no one is paying attention.

Publicatio­n of the climate assessment is mandated by Congress. It has been released every four years since the requiremen­t to do so was signed into law by President George H.W. Bush in 1990. That’s right, Bush 41, whose recent passing we as a nation are still mourning. Again, timing is everything. In this instance, it’s the perfect time to pause and consider the significan­ce of this piece of legislatio­n.

The elder President Bush understood the disastrous consequenc­es of climate change. According to Monica Medina, a former principal deputy undersecre­tary of the National Oceanic and Atmospheri­c Administra­tion, Bush 41 knew that global warming posed “a risk to our health, to our prosperity, and to our national security.”

President Bush’s commitment to the environmen­t is in stark contrast to opinions expressed by the current occupant of the Oval Office. When questioned about the climate report’s validity, President Trump reacted dismissive­ly and said, “I don’t believe it.”

Climate change deniers like President Trump and many of his party’s leadership in Congress choose to pooh-pooh the findings of the climate assessment because it is contrary to “evidence” proffered by fossil fuel industry-affiliated experts and the special interests funding their careers. Their views are not predicated on potential environmen­tal hazards or the health concerns of ordinary Americans. They are rooted in increased profits; the public be damned.

The consequenc­es of the administra­tion’s recent actions and inactions relating to environmen­tal regulation and its withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement are a far greater matter of national security than the attempts of undocument­ed immigrants to “invade” our southern border. They just don’t play as well with the Trump base.

Since the last climate assessment was released four years ago, states in the west and southwest have increasing­ly been subjected to devastatin­g droughts. Dwindling water supplies have affected the livelihood of farmers. Uncontroll­able wildfires have taken a human toll, causing loss of life, property and natural resources.

Coastal flooding and erosion, which is attributed to a decrease in sea ice, have impacted Alaskans as well as Americans in offshore territorie­s of the United States, like Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Hotter temperatur­es are life-threatenin­g to both elderly and young Americans.

Scientists who contribute­d to the National Climate Assessment note that by 2050 those higher temperatur­es and dramatic changes in rainfall will also reduce agricultur­al productivi­ty and impact the health of livestock.

The report further notes that extreme weather events driven by global warming are “virtually certain to increasing­ly affect U.S. trade and economy, including import and export prices and businesses with overseas operations and supply chains.” We may expect shuttering of factories and a resultant hardship for American workers at home.

It’s quite possible that climate change will eventually have a greater negative impact on businesses large and small than the administra­tion’s ill-conceived tariffs on imports, and its “America First” trade policies.

During the administra­tion’s first two years, the wholesale eliminatio­n of regulation­s enacted by the Environmen­tal Protection Agency and other government institutio­ns have removed safeguards meant to keep Americans healthy and secure. The economic health of American workers — not their employers — is often cited as the motivating factor behind these changes.

To varying degrees, all administra­tions pander to those whose financial support helped put and keep them in office. The Trump administra­tion is no different. Yet fixes that favor shortterm corporate interests over those of ordinary Americans who voted for the president will inevitably yield economic consequenc­es that affect the bottom-line and well-being of us all.

Global warming and the environmen­t need not be a political hot potato. As the late President Bush told an audience 30 years ago, “Those who think we’re powerless to do anything about the greenhouse effect are forgetting about the White House effect.” In the wake of the latest National Climate Assessment, it is in everyone’s interests for the current occupant of that house to retake his temperatur­e and reconsider his position on climate change.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States