Imperial Valley Press

Fresh from the lab: Startups make meat that avoids slaughter

-

EMERYVILLE, Calif. (AP) — Uma Valeti slices into a pan-fried chicken cutlet in the kitchen of his startup, Memphis Meats. He sniffs the tender morsel on his fork before taking a bite. He chews slowly, absorbing the taste.

“Our chicken is chicken ... you’ve got to taste it to believe it,” Valeti says.

This is no ordinary piece of poultry. No chicken was raised or slaughtere­d to harvest the meat. It was produced in a laboratory by extracting cells from a chicken and feeding them in a nutrient broth until the cell culture grew into raw meat.

Memphis Meats, based in Emeryville, California, is one of a growing number of startups worldwide that are making cell-based or cultured meat. They want to offer an alternativ­e to traditiona­l meat production that they say is damaging the environmen­t and causing unnecessar­y harm to animals, but they are far from becoming mainstream and face pushback from livestock producers.

“You are ultimately going to continue the choice of eating meat for many generation­s to come without putting undue stress on the planet,” said Valeti, a former cardiologi­st who co-founded Memphis Meats in 2015 after seeing the power of stem cells to treat disease.

The company, which also has produced cell-grown beef and duck, has attracted investment­s from food giants Cargill and Tyson Foods as well as billionair­es Richard Branson and Bill Gates.

A report released in June by consulting firm A.T. Kearney predicts that by 2040, cultured meat will make up 35 percent of meat consumed worldwide, while plant-based alternativ­es will compose 25 percent.

“The large-scale livestock industry is viewed by many as an unnecessar­y evil,” the report says. “With the advantages of novel vegan meat replacemen­ts and cultured meat over convention­ally produced meat, it is only a matter of time before meat replacemen­ts capture a substantia­l market share.”

But first cultured meat must overcome significan­t challenges, including bringing down the exorbitant cost of production, showing regulators it’s safe and enticing consumers to take a bite.

“We’re a long way off from becoming a commercial reality because there are many hurdles we have to tackle,” said Ricardo San Martin, research director of the alternativ­e meat program at the University of California, Berkeley. “We don’t know if consumers are going to buy this or not.”

As global demand for meat grows, supporters say cell-based protein is more sustainabl­e than traditiona­l meat because it doesn’t require the land, water and crops needed to raise livestock — a major source of greenhouse gas emissions.

Many consumers would love to eat meat that doesn’t require killing animals, said Brian Spears, who founded a San Francisco startup called New Age Meats that served its cell-based pork sausages to curious foodies at a tasting last September.

“People want meat. They don’t want slaughter,” Spears said. “So we make slaughter-free meat, and we know there’s a massive market for people that want delicious meat that doesn’t require animal slaughter.”

 ?? AP Photo/terry cheA ?? In this photo taken April 11, Memphis Meats CEO Uma Valeti shows chicken his company produced in a laboratory from chicken cells in Emeryville, Calif.
AP Photo/terry cheA In this photo taken April 11, Memphis Meats CEO Uma Valeti shows chicken his company produced in a laboratory from chicken cells in Emeryville, Calif.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States