Inc. (USA)

Stacey Abrams Means Business

From a grassroots movement to a fintech revolution, she finds her biggest ideas in the wake of the ones that don’t work.

- BY TENESHIA CARR

STACEY ABRAMS HAS a knack for turning failures into successes. After conceding in a tight 2018 gubernator­ial race in Georgia, the 47-year-old entreprene­ur, lawyer, writer, and former legislator turned her attention to fighting the state’s restrictiv­e voting laws— and ended up helping her party win the presidency and the Senate two years later. As an entreprene­ur, Abrams and her serial co-founder, Lara Hodgson, started and shuttered two businesses before landing on the fast-growing fintech company, called Now (nowcorp.com), that they’ve been building since 2010.

The company addresses one of the biggest pain points that Abrams and Hodgson have experience­d in their own entreprene­urial journey—one that will ring a loud bell for any founder of a cash-strapped startup who’s had to stare down the impossible choice between paying invoices on time and keeping operations humming. After growing largely by word of mouth for its first decade, Now recently landed a $9.5 million Series A investment aimed at taking the platform national. It’s too early for Abrams to declare success, but failure isn’t even on the table.

How did you decide to become a startup founder?

I was a reluctant entreprene­ur. I have a wide range of interests, and I love learning new things. But I also enjoy the mechanics of running businesses. What has kept me in entreprene­urship is that it lets me multitask as a job.

What skills have you developed in your political career that help you in your entreprene­urship?

I became an entreprene­ur and a political leader at the same time, so I would say they’re mutually reinforcin­g. Whether you are trying to pass a bill, win an election, or start a company, clarity is incredibly important. Taking the time to write out the steps of how you’re going to get it done and understand­ing the obstacles and the opportunit­ies are skills I’ve had to foster and hone in both spaces.

In your experience, what are some of the benefits and drawbacks to having a co-founder versus going at it alone?

I appreciate the independen­ce that comes with starting a company yourself, but I advise people to start with a partner. You are always going to have blind spots, and having a business partner gives you an interest in identifyin­g your blind spots before others see them. It is an extraordin­ary way to learn new skills. I didn’t

go to business school, but Lara and I tease each other that I now have a bootleg MBA and she has a bootleg law degree. The negative of having a co-founder is that you have to balance your ego with your ambition—but in the end I’ve always found I’m better at what I do when I have smart, thoughtful people doing it with me.

You had to fold your second startup, Nourish, which made formula-ready baby bottles filled with spring water, not for any lack of orders from retailers but because you didn’t have the financing you needed to fill those orders. How did you think about moving forward after that?

We’ve been taught that failure is this negative word for us to recoil from. But the issue isn’t whether you succeed or fail. When Nourish failed, we failed because we grew to death. So we didn’t let that moment define our capacity for success, and we didn’t let it dictate what we were going to do next. Instead of rehashing what we could have done differentl­y had we been born millionair­es, or if we had taken this or that opportunit­y, we thought, “OK, what we did we learn from this?” We simply learned that our business model did not work.

In your 2018 TED Talk, you said that “finances are often a reason we don’t let ourselves dream.” How did you allow yourself to dream during your period of financial struggle?

Lots of practice. You know, when you grow up with economic poverty, you have a great deal of opportunit­y to figure out that while money is absolutely a real impediment, it is not always insurmount­able. I watched my family surmount it. And so one thing we did with Nourish is that Lara and I never quit our other jobs. We kept our other company, Insomnia Consulting, going while we were building Nourish, and for me that was essential. I was solely responsibl­e for my economic success, and that meant I had to have these other sources of income while we were waiting for Nourish to become profitable.

How were you ultimately able to see the opportunit­y to start Now, which offers a service to pay off the invoices of small businesses for a small percentage?

We realized there was a pain point for small businesses that sold to one another that wasn’t being addressed by the capital markets and wasn’t being discussed in the conversati­ons we heard about business. We looked at what failed for us and decided to fix what we saw was broken.

What does success look like for Now?

Right now, the financial system is not designed for small businesses to succeed. We’re seen as miniature versions of big businesses. And that’s not how small business works. A big business can carry $150,000 worth of unpaid invoices, because they can access all the credit they want. For a small business, that’s drowning. Our goal is to step into that gap, because currently, the capital markets either expect you to borrow the money you need or to sell off part of your business to get the money you need. If Now is successful, we change the way small businesses are treated by a system that sees them as beggars at the table, not income generators that deserve their own system of capital.

A big business can carry $150,000 worth of unpaid invoices. For a small business, that’s drowning.

 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States