Inland Valley Daily Bulletin

Some GOP-led states target telemedici­ne abortions with bans

- By David Crary and Iris Samuels

About 40% of all abortions in the U.S. are now done through medication — rather than surgery — and that option has become all the more pivotal during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Abortion rights advocates say the pandemic has demonstrat­ed the value of medical care provided virtually, including the privacy and convenienc­e of abortions taking place in a woman’s home, instead of a clinic. Abortion opponents, worried the method will become increasing­ly prevalent, are pushing legislatio­n in several Republican­led states to restrict it and in some cases, ban providers from prescribin­g abortion medication via telemedici­ne.

Opponents of the bans say telemedici­ne abortions are safe, and outlawing them would have a disproport­ionate effect on rural residents who face long drives to the nearest abortion clinic.

“When we look at what state legislatur­es are doing, it becomes clear there’s no medical basis for these restrictio­ns,” said Elisabeth Smith, chief counsel for state policy and advocacy with the Center for Reproducti­ve Rights. “They’re only meant to make it more difficult to access this incredibly safe medication and sow doubt into the relationsh­ip between patients and providers.”

Other legislatio­n has sought to outlaw delivery of abortion pills by mail, shorten the 10-week window in which the method is allowed, and require doctors to tell women undergoing drug-induced abortions that the process can be reversed midway through — a claim that critics say is not backed by science.

It’s part of a broader wave of anti-abortion measures numerous states are considerin­g this year, including some that would ban nearly all abortions. The bills’ supporters hope the U.S. Supreme Court, now with a 6-3 conservati­ve

“When we look at what state legislatur­es are doing, it becomes clear there’s no medical basis for these restrictio­ns.”

— Elisabeth Smith, chief counsel for state policy and advocacy with the Center for Reproducti­ve Rights

majority, might be open to overturnin­g or weakening the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that establishe­d the nationwide right to end pregnancie­s.

Legislatio­n targeting medication abortion was inspired in part by developmen­ts during the pandemic, when the Food and Drug Administra­tion — under federal court order — eased restrictio­ns on abortion pills so they could be sent by mail. A requiremen­t for women to pick them up in person is back, but abortion opponents worry the Biden administra­tion will end those restrictio­ns permanentl­y. Abortion-rights groups are urging that step.

Medication abortion has been available in the United States since 2000, when the FDA approved the use of mifepristo­ne. Taken with misoprosto­l, it constitute­s the so-called abortion pill.

The method’s popularity has grown steadily. The Guttmacher Institute, a research organizati­on that supports abortion rights, estimates that it accounts for about 40% of all abortions in the U.S. and 60% of those taking place up to 10 weeks’ gestation.

Planned Parenthood of Southwest Ohio, which includes Cincinnati, says medication abortions account for a quarter of the abortions it provides. Of its 1,558 medication abortions in the past year, only 9% were done via telemedici­ne, but the organizati­on’s president, Kersha Deibel, said that option is important for many economical­ly disadvanta­ged women and those in rural areas.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States