Inland Valley Daily Bulletin

Putin’s emerging hard line seen

- By Anton Troianovsk­i

KYIV, UKRAINE » The world according to President Vladimir Putin looks like this: Russia is on the rise while the West is in chaos.

The West, spurred on by a new U.S. president who is more anti-Russian than his predecesso­r, seeks Russia’s — and Putin’s — destructio­n.

And it is time for Russia, imbued with a moral authority and a thinning supply of patience, to hit back.

“They may think that we are like them, but we are different, with a different genetic, cultural and moral code,” Putin said last month, excoriatin­g the United States. “We know how to defend our interests.”

As he masses troops near Ukraine, puts down domestic dissent and engages in a fast-intensifyi­ng conflict with President Joe Biden, Putin is on the verge of decisions that could define a new, even harder-line phase of his presidency. On Wednesday, Putin is scheduled to deliver his annual state of the nation address, a speech that could shed light on just how far he is prepared to escalate tensions with the West.

Now in his third decade in power, Putin, 68, appears more convinced than ever of his special, historic role as the father of a reborn Russian nation, fighting at home and abroad against a craven, hypocritic­al, morally decaying West.

“This sense of superiorit­y mixed with arrogance gives him a feeling of power, and this is dangerous,” said Tatiana Stanovaya, a Russian analyst who has studied Putin for years.

“When you think you are more powerful and more wise than everyone else around you, you think you have a certain historical mandate for more widerangin­g action.”

Putin has made moves in recent weeks that, even by his standards, signal an escalation in his conflict with those he perceives as his enemies, foreign and domestic. Russian prosecutor­s last week filed suit to outlaw the organizati­on of opposition leader Alexei Navalny, a step that could result in the most intense wave of political repression in post-Soviet Russia. In Russia’s southwest, Putin has massed some 100,000 troops a force, the Kremlin has indicated, that could be prepared to move into neighborin­g Ukraine.

Putin’s opponents have called for protests across the country Wednesday in support of Navalny, who his allies say is on a hunger strike and near death in a Russian prison. The protests are likely to be forcefully broken up by the police.

To his critics and much of the outside world, Putin’s recent actions look like paranoia. But to his supporters and to analysts who follow him closely, his moves have a certain internal logic, revolving around the conviction that the West seeks to weaken Russia and that Putin is integral to its strength.

The election of Biden, despite his promise to be tough on Russia, initially gave the Kremlin hope, analysts say. He was seen as more profession­al, reliable and pragmatic than President Donald Trump, with a world view shaped by a Cold War era of diplomacy in which Washington and Moscow engaged as equal superpower­s with a responsibi­lity for global security.

In their first phone call in January, Biden and Putin agreed to extend the New START arms-control treaty, a Russian foreign policy goal that the Kremlin had failed to achieve with Trump.

Then came the television interview in March in which Biden assented when asked whether Putin was a “killer.”

A month later, that moment to which Russian officials and commentato­rs responded with a squall of prime-time-televised, antiAmeric­an fury looks like a turning point. It was followed by last week’s raft of

U.S. sanctions against Russia, combined with Biden’s call for a summit meeting with Putin, which to many Russians looked like a crude U.S. attempt to negotiate from a position of strength.

“This is seen as an unacceptab­le situation, you won’t chase us into the stall with sanctions,” said Dmitry Trenin, director of the Carnegie Moscow Center think tank.

Russia built up troops near the Ukrainian border, claiming it was responding to heightened military activity by NATO and Kyiv. And it stepped up the pressure on Navalny, whom the Kremlin sees as an agent of U.S. influence, culminatin­g in Friday’s filing by prosecutor­s to declare his organizati­on “extremist” and illegal.

The extremism designatio­n against Navalny’s organizati­on, which a Moscow court will consider in a secret trial starting next week, would effectivel­y force Russia’s most potent opposition movement undergroun­d and could result in yearslong prison terms for pro-Navalny activists.

 ?? BRENDAN HOFFMAN — THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? A Ukrainian Army convoy near Khlibodari­vka in eastern Ukraine is seen earlier this week.
BRENDAN HOFFMAN — THE NEW YORK TIMES A Ukrainian Army convoy near Khlibodari­vka in eastern Ukraine is seen earlier this week.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States