Journal-Advocate (Sterling)

State Board passes new social studies standards

- By Erica Meltzer

Colorado social studies lessons must include the experience­s and contributi­ons of diverse groups: Latino, Indigenous, African American, Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander, religious minorities, and LGBTQ people.

In a series of 4-3 party line votes Thursday, Democrats on the Colorado State Board of Education approved social studies standards with an expansive view of the American story and who has a place in it. The decision restored many specific references that had been cut from the draft standards in response to negative feedback from conservati­ves.

And the board also voted unanimousl­y to make changes to standards that guide instructio­n about the Holocaust and genocide, clarifying that the Nazi Party was fascist, not socialist, and adding historic and contempora­ry atrocities to the list of what students should know.

The decision moves Colorado in the opposite direction of states under Republican control that are passing laws to limit how teachers can talk about race, gender, and sexuality and also to limit how they can support students.

The State Board heard months of debate and received hundreds of emails about the standards. Conservati­ve parents said the standards would divide students by race and ethnicity and introduce ideas about sex and gender at a young age, potentiall­y in violation of parents’ values. Republican board members largely agreed.

In response, a standards committee made up of teachers, community members, and other experts stripped out many specific references in favor of terms like “diverse groups” and “marginaliz­ed perspectiv­es.”

After those changes, other groups including parents, students, and teachers, rallied in defense of the more inclusive and specific version of the standards. They said students would benefit from seeing themselves in the curriculum and in American history.

In particular, queer youth said they would have understood themselves better and feared less for their futures if they had learned about gay or transgende­r people living full lives and

contributi­ng to their communitie­s. They also want their peers to understand them better.

“My existence is not political,” said Reina Hernandez, a trans Latina student at Cherry Creek High School. “It’s simply been politicize­d to pursue a political agenda. Will you support my right as a student to exist publicly?”

Approved standards name groups, require specifics

The State Board restored most of the cut material Thursday, with some formatting changes to reduce repetition.

In preschool, rather than asking students, “Why is it important to hear and share multiple diverse perspectiv­es?” a teacher would ask, “Why is it important to hear what friends from different background­s (cultures, races, languages, religions, family compositio­n, etc.) have to say?”

In eighth grade, rather than ask students to “analyze evidence from multiple sources including those with conflictin­g accounts about specific events in both Colorado and United States history,” the standard names the perspectiv­es that should be considered: “Indigenous Peoples’, Hawaiian/pacific Islander, and African American perspectiv­es on Western colonizati­on and enslavemen­t, Asian American and Latinos’ perspectiv­es on immigratio­n, the Indian Removal Act, the Buffalo Soldiers, and the Sand Creek Massacre.”

Republican­s focused their concerns on references in early grades to LGBTQ people. One preschool standard says students should show interest in interactin­g with and developing relationsh­ips with people from a range of background­s, and names LGBTQ people among other groups.

Democratic board members said this would look like children sharing freely about their families and bringing in family photos, whether they have a mom and a dad or two dads. Republican board member Steve Durham countered with the example of drag queen story time sessions held at some libraries.

He described the standards as “anti-parent,” and some parents in the audience agreed.

Mary Goodley described teaching her toddler to sit, then walk, then run, and said teaching younger children about the contributi­ons of members of the LGBTQ community would be like asking them to run before they could sit. She imagined her child entering school, learning about a notable leader in the LGBTQ community, and then wondering what LGBTQ means.

“I don’t want my child’s first grade teacher to introduce him to these vast sexual complexiti­es,” Goodley said. “Teaching children about particular sex and gender notions is a clear violation of parental rights … and decreases trust in the public education model.”

And parent Janelle Rumley said the idea that students need to see themselves in the curriculum disturbed her, because it suggests white children like her own couldn’t learn from or be inspired by Martin Luther King Jr. or Harriet Tubman.

But other parents said without specifics in the standards, their communitie­s’ history just doesn’t get taught.

Maria Guadalupe Cardoza said she has nine children in the Boulder Valley school district, and “the only thing my children learn about our history is from people of their same color.”

Hernandez, the Cherry Creek student, has been working to develop a class that would cover LGBTQ issues and ethnic studies. It’s been hard to convince administra­tors the topics are as important as other academic subjects, she said. Having social studies standards that list by name the groups whose stories should be told would help students make their case.

“For a very long time, I was scared of who I was,” she said. “With education, it helps.”

Standards will shape instructio­n, but not dictate it

Colorado does not set curriculum or choose textbooks at the state level. That will be up to school districts. The standards lay out what students are supposed to know, and school districts usually try to pick curriculum that aligns with state standards. However, there is little enforcemen­t, especially in subjects like social studies.

The State Board was required to update the social studies standards to comply with several new state laws that require the inclusion of more diverse perspectiv­es in social studies, call for more robust civics instructio­n, and make learning about the Holocaust and genocide a graduation requiremen­t.

All three requiremen­ts became politicall­y contentiou­s. Republican board member Deb Scheffel wanted Colorado civics standards to be based on the conservati­ve American Birthright standards, an idea Democrats rejected. And Durham shaped the standards around the Holocaust and genocide to associate Nazis with socialism and emphasize the dangers of left-wing government­s, leading history teachers, Jewish groups, and others to call for changes.

Also on Thursday, the State Board voted unanimousl­y to make changes to the genocide standards before finalizing the social studies standards. After reading out a quote in which Hitler attacked Jews for being capitalist­s, Durham voted with other board members to add the word fascist to the descriptio­n of the Nazi Party at the suggestion of board member Rebecca Mcclellan.

Board members also voted unanimousl­y to restore references to Bosnia, Rwanda, and Darfur that had been lost and, at the suggestion of Board Chair Angelika Schroeder, added a requiremen­t that students learn about the Sand Creek massacre as a genocide.

“I don’t want people to think with all the -isms that this only happens in other countries,” Schroeder said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States