Las Vegas Review-Journal (Sunday)

Dealing with HOA-foreclosed homes

-

Q: Know anything about “deed in lieu of foreclosur­e?” A homeowners associatio­n was in the latter stages of the foreclosur­e process against a homeowner in arrears for assessment­s and fines.

Suddenly, some financial institutio­n steps in and files a deed in lieu of foreclosur­e. This institutio­n paid off the assessment­s and collection costs. Does this type of deed act the same as a full-blown foreclosur­e and wipe away the possibilit­y of us collecting fines (a legal gray area, we know)? Should we consider ourselves lucky in that we got collection costs? Do we have recourse for fines or are they washed away? As usual, thanks in advance.

One other item in question. In the process of a “convention­al” sale, it’s our understand­ing that the buyer is issued a set of covenants, conditions and restrictio­ns a minimum of five days prior to the closing. He signs a document at closing attesting that he was issued the CC&Rs and had the opportunit­y to review them prior to closing. What happens at a deed in lieu or a foreclosur­e (auction) transfer? Are CC&R’s anywhere in the mix? Is a doc is signed? If not, could that come back to bite the HOA in, uh, an anatomical area intended for sitting?

Sorry, one last thing. We’ve had a couple of foreclosur­es recently. There’s a rumor of a 60-day rescission period is afforded to the buyer? True or false? Is this possibly related to the buyer not recording promptly? OK. I’m done. A: A deed in lieu of foreclosur­e is a method whereby a homeowner has transferre­d ownership of her home to the lender. By accepting the deed in lieu of foreclosur­e, the lender has agreed the loan has been satisfied. No further action would be taken by the lender against the homeowner to pay off the loan. In your case, the associatio­n was able to collect the unpaid assessment­s and collection costs. Consider yourselves lucky. Trying to collect fines would probably cost the associatio­n more money in legal fees than the fines themselves. The associatio­n should reverse the fines on this home but if the violations still exist, the associatio­n has the right to begin the violation process against the new owners.

Nevada Revised Statutes 116.4109 pertains to the resale of homes. It was passed by the legislatur­e in an effort to fully inform a potential buyer about the associatio­n, from its financial and legal status to the legal obligation­s of a homeowner. NRS 116.4101 section 2 states that a certificat­e of resale need not be prepared or delivered in cases of gratuitous dispositio­n of a unit, dispositio­n pursuant to court order, dispositio­n by a government or government­al agency, dispositio­n by foreclosur­e or deed in lieu of foreclosur­e.

You are correct in that in a sheriff’s sale of a home (as an example), the buyer may not be aware of their obligation­s to the associatio­n, unless she has reached out to the associatio­n for informatio­n. It would be a good idea for your associatio­n to provide the new owner with copies of the governing documents.

Finally, it is not a rumor. In 2015, the Legislatur­e passed a 60-day right of redemption. This law allows both the homeowner or their lender to regain possession of the home by paying off the associatio­n.

A buyer of a foreclosed home must take extra precaution­s because of this right of redemption. This new law will definitely delay any sales of an associatio­n’s foreclosed homes.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States