Las Vegas Review-Journal (Sunday)

Who will be our next reality show president?

- By STEVE JOHNSON

Two years ago, Donald Trump could be seen “firing” Lorenzo Lamas on “Celebrity Apprentice.” Jan. 20, he took the oath of office as president of the United States.

This transforma­tion raises several questions: Who knew the people who watch reality shows also vote? How does Lamas feel about being the last victim of pretend Trump power? And, more important, what are the chances of another reality show producing a future president? Let’s celebrate this exciting new era in American democracy by examining the possibilit­ies.

“Real Housewives of (Wherever)”: It was once thought that the kind of oversharin­g and misbehavin­g these ladies of various cities are encouraged to indulge in would be a disqualify­ing factor for 1600 Pennsylvan­ia Avenue. Those were simpler times. Still, I like to close my eyes real tight and imagine a future in which such antics will be disqualify­ing once again. Presidenti­al chances: None.

“The Voice”: So many choices here. There’s host Carson Daly, a Dapper Dan sort just thrilled that he has a prime-time gig, that he isn’t only the latest of network late-night hosts. There are all those musical coach/judges: Blake Shelton, Gwen Stefani, Adam Levine and, this year, Alicia Keys and Miley Cyrus. The smart money would be on the elegant and multitalen­ted Keys or Stefani becoming the first female president, but they are both so very blue state. So let’s ignore the smart money — that seems to be the trend — and realize that if anybody comes out of this one, it’s likely to be Cyrus. She gets good ol’ boys via her dad, millennial­s via her tats, and she has just enough crazy in her to appeal to Americans who, after Trump, want to stick it to the establishm­ent even more. Presidenti­al chances: Not half bad.

“The Bachelor”: In this show a group of wellgroome­d people who are always “on” for the camera argue frequently among themselves and pretend to want one thing very much when what they really want is something else: victory. It is, in other words, a close analogue to the presidenti­al primary system. But as we’ve seen, the primaries these days rarely do a good job producing candidates we can get excited about. Presidenti­al chances: About as high as the chances of “Bachelor”-spawned “love” lasting.

“Survivor”: This is produced by Mark Burnett, as was the original “Apprentice” that turned Trump from a New York media figure into a national media figure. The host there, the sort of Trumplike constant through the run of the series, has been Jeff Probst. Probst is an American and of the constituti­onally required age, yet despite being in the public eye for so many years, he seems to lack messianic tendencies. Sad. As for the contestant­s, they are all kind of a blur to me, one set of abs indistingu­ishable from the next. Presidenti­al chances: Low.

“American Idol”: This is a decent crucible for the presidency. The judges have to listen to a lot of really bad (musical) ideas and sort them out from the people with genuine talent. Then they have to deliver news, good and bad, in a way that keeps people liking them. And the show has already trained hordes of young Americans to vote, albeit by cellphone. I don’t see any of the judges as a viable candidate, however. Simon Cowell and Keith Urban wouldn’t be able to beat the birther issue. Steven Tyler is too old, Paula Abdul and Jennifer Lopez too nice. But when we look at the contestant­s, we start getting somewhere. Carrie Underwood and Kelly Clarkson (she shared the inaugurati­on stage with President Obama in 2013)? Good choices. But I kind of like Clay Aiken in this one. He’s already run for U.S. Congress and says he might do it again, and a Democratic gay dad from a red state — and one who can sing at his own inaugurati­on — might be just the uniter America needs. Presidenti­al chances: Medium strong.

“The Amazing Race”: What this country’s problems demand is a president who can get from St. Paul to Saskatoon with only a bus token, one hiking shoe and a length of jump rope. Accomplish that, and the budget deficit, the wealth gap and the crumbling infrastruc­ture seem like easy fixes. Somewhere amid this series’ years of globe-trotting challenges, there exists a potential can-do commander in chief. The problem is that “Amazing Race” has its people work in pairs, and the U.S. presidency remains stubbornly committed to individual­ism. Presidenti­al chances: So-so.

“The New Celebrity Apprentice”: Watching Arnold Schwarzene­gger host this gathering of hasbeens as they feign interest in business tasks, it seems absurd to consider that a president might arise from such a morass of ego and thwarted ambition. Isn’t it pretty to think so? Presidenti­al chances: Lightning doesn’t strike twice.

“Who Wants to Be a Millionair­e?”: If our president has to emerge from a madefor-television competitio­n, many of us would like it to be from a show testing intelligen­ce and knowledge — such as “Millionair­e” or “Jeopardy.” It seems, alas, that those of us who feel that way have made residency choices that dilute our potential power in the Electoral College, which, it turns out, means we are not nearly as smart as we think we are. Presidenti­al chances: Slim, none.

“Keeping Up with the Kardashian­s”: Well, duh. Now that I think about it, this is almost a foregone conclusion. Khloe will have already been nominated for secretary of education while we all prepare, a dozen or so years from now, to watch the swearing-in of President Kim Kardashian as first gentleman Kanye West stands by her side. Presidenti­al chances: Inevitable.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ?? NBC UNIVERSAL ?? The swearing-in of President Kim Kardashian a dozen or so years from now may be inevitable.
NBC UNIVERSAL The swearing-in of President Kim Kardashian a dozen or so years from now may be inevitable.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States