Las Vegas Review-Journal (Sunday)

Studies renew worry about radiation effect

Concerns raised over government control

- By Ralph Vartabedia­n

LOS ANGELES — At the dawn of the nuclear age, the Franklin D. Roosevelt administra­tion placed the nation’s major nuclear weapons production and research facilities in large, isolated reservatio­ns to shield them from foreign spies — and to protect the American public from the still unknown risks of radioactiv­ity.

By the late 1980s, near the end of the Cold War, federal lands in South Carolina, Tennessee, New Mexico, Colorado, Ohio and Washington state, among other places, were so polluted with radionucli­des that the land was deemed permanentl­y unsuitable for human habitation.

That much has long been accepted as a price for the nation’s nuclear deterrent. But a far more complex problem could emerge if recent research is correct.

Studies by a Massachuse­tts scientist say that invisible radioactiv­e particles of plutonium, thorium and uranium are showing up in household dust, automotive air cleaners and along hiking trails outside the factories and laboratori­es that for half a century contribute­d to the nation’s stockpile of nuclear weapons.

The findings provide troubling new evidence that the federal government is losing control of at least some of the radioactiv­e byproducts of the country’s weapons program.

Marco Kaltofen, a nuclear forensics expert and a professor at Worcester Polytechni­c Institute, said he collected samples from communitie­s outside three lab sites across the nation and found a wide variation of particle sizes. He said they could deliver lifelong doses that exceed allowable federal standards if inhaled.

“If you inhale two particles, you will exceed your lifetime dose under occupation­al standards, and there is a low probabilit­y of detecting it,” he said.

A peer-reviewed study by Kaltofen was published in its final form in May in Environmen­tal Engineerin­g Science.

Kaltofen, who also is the principal investigat­or at the nuclear and chemical forensics consulting firm Boston Chemical Data Corp., released a second study in recent weeks.

The Energy Department has long insisted that small particles like those collected by Kaltofen deliver minute doses of radioactiv­ity, well below typical public exposures.

One of the nation’s leading experts on radioactiv­ity doses, Bruce Napier, who works in the Energy Department’s lab system, said the doses cited by Kaltofen would not pose a threat to public health.

Such assurances have been rejected by nuclear plant workers, their unions and activists who monitor environmen­tal issues at nearly every lab and nuclear weapons site in the nation.

Jay Coghlan, executive director of Nuclear Watch New Mexico, cited a long history of denial about the claims of “down winders,” the residents of Western states who were exposed to radioactiv­e fallout from atmospheri­c weapons testing.

“We cannot trust self-reporting by the Department of Energy,” he said. “I don’t accept that low levels of radioactiv­ity have no risk.”

Tom Carpenter, executive director of another watchdog group, the Hanford Challenge in central Washington, said as recently as last year that the Energy Department released an unknown quantity of radioactiv­e particles during demolition of a shuttered weapons factory, the Plutonium Finishing Plant.

After a series of three releases during 2017, the Energy Department shut down the demolition and has yet to resume it. Forty-two workers were exposed in the incidents.

 ?? Mark Boster Los Angeles Times ?? Signs warn visitors approachin­g the B Reactor on the Hanford Nuclear Reservatio­n in south-central Washington.
Mark Boster Los Angeles Times Signs warn visitors approachin­g the B Reactor on the Hanford Nuclear Reservatio­n in south-central Washington.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States