Las Vegas Review-Journal (Sunday)

The Kansas City (Mo.) Star on political robotexts (Aug. 3):

-

Political text messages sent to mobile devices are allowed under federal regulation­s. But robocalls and robotexts to mobile phones require expressed prior consent from the recipients, according to the Federal Communicat­ion Commission.

Did anyone ask you for permission to light up your phone?

The proliferat­ion of unsolicite­d mobile phone campaign ads must end. And the federal oversight agency must crack down on the practice. Unwarrante­d mobile phone messages are annoying, and can distract us from important matters.

In the days and weeks leading up to Tuesday’s primary, unsuspecti­ng voters were besieged with text after text. Some messages included an option to opt out from receiving more messages. Others didn’t. And that is a pressing issue that must be addressed.

Federal regulation­s are supposed to protect us from unwanted political robocalls or texts, which can be disseminat­ed without prior consent if sent manually, according to FCC regulation­s. But the legal workaround is annoying, and requires recipients to do the work.

Voters can take matters into their own hands by forwarding unsolicite­d texts to 7726 (or SPAM).

Campaigns must also honor opt-out requests if they get a reply of STOP, the FCC states on its website. But where is the darn oversight and enforcemen­t of the regulation­s?

From the FCC: If you think you’ve received a political robocall or text that does not comply with the FCC’S rules, you can file an informal complaint with the federal agency at fcc.gov/complaints.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States