Las Vegas Review-Journal (Sunday)

What about Democratic ‘election deniers’?

- LARRY ELDER Larry Elder is a bestsellin­g author and nationally syndicated radio talkshow host. Follow on Twitter @larryelder.

AFTER the recent annual Conservati­ve Political Action Conference convention in Dallas, CNN published a video with the following headline: “Election deniers take over CPAC after primary victories.”

In a recent appearance on CBS, Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger,

R-ill., who voted to impeach former President Donald Trump and serves on the House Jan. 6 committee, said: “The only thing we need for democracy to survive is the knowledge that you can vote, that that vote counts, and we live with the winner and loser. If half the country believes that that wasn’t accurate, you can’t expect democracy to survive.”

Where was this concern about “election deniers” when Democrats have complained about “stolen” elections?

In 2018, Democrat Stacey Abrams claimed she lost her Georgia gubernator­ial race because of voter “suppressio­n.” She refused to concede. Three years later, she told CNN that her opponent “won under the rules of the game at the time, but the game was rigged against the voters of Georgia.” A USA Today fact check said, “There is little empirical evidence (oppoent Brian) Kemp stole the election.

Former Vice President Al Gore, in a Washington Post interview two years after his presidenti­al defeat to George W. Bush, said, “I believe that if everyone in Florida who tried to vote had had his or her vote counted properly, that I would have won.”

In January 2001 several House Democrats voted against certifying the election results of 2000.

Had Ohio, in 2004, gone to Democrat John Kerry, he would have become president. President George W. Bush carried it 51-49 in a margin of about 100,000 votes. But Jan. 6 Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson, D-miss., on Jan. 6, 2005, joined 30 other House Democrats and Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-calif., in refusing to certify Ohio’s presidenti­al election results, claiming “voter suppressio­n” in addition to arguing, also with no basis in fact, that the Diebold voting machines were manipulate­d to re-elect Bush.

The Senate voted 74-1 against the Democrats’ challenge.

Hillary Clinton consistent­ly calls the presidenti­al election of 2016 “stolen” and described Trump as “illegitima­te.” Former President Jimmy Carter said in 2019: “I think a full investigat­ion would show that Trump didn’t actually win the election in 2016. He lost the election, and he was put into office because the Russians interfered on his behalf.” New York Attorney General Letitia James said she “will never be afraid to challenge this illegitima­te president.”

About the 2016 election, former Obama Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson testified under oath that, while the Russians tried to manipulate voting machines, there is no evidence that a single vote tally was changed.

As to the effect of Russian interferen­ce, Johnson said that there’s no way of knowing whether the interferen­ce affected public opinion or the election result.

Neverthele­ss a 2018 Yougov poll found 66 percent of Democrats believe that Russia changed vote tallies to elect Trump in 2016. A 2018 Gallup poll found 78 percent of Democrats believe that Russian interferen­ce in 2016 “changed the outcome of the election” in favor of Trump.

About the 2020 election, CNN politics editor Chris Cillizza wrote: “76 percent of self-identified Republican­s in a new national Quinnipiac University poll. That’s the number of Republican­s who said they believe there was ‘widespread fraud in the 2020 election.’”

As noted, a greater percentage of Democrats, 78 percent, consider 2016’s presidenti­al election to have been “stolen” compared with 76 percent of Republican­s who feel likewise about 2020.

Now what?

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States