Las Vegas Review-Journal (Sunday)

Homeowner wants to take tree out

- BARBARA HOLLAND ASSOCIATIO­N Q&A

Q: I live in (a local) community and am taking care of my mom, an amputee in a wheelchair. Your name has come into conversati­on this afternoon with an issue in our homeowners associatio­n that I believe, is within your realm of expertise; seeing how, the only next person we would call is our lawyer.

Synopsis: I’m looking to remove the following tree and replace it with a large boulder. For the past three years, the tree has been a constant headache in terms of maintenanc­e, fire hazard, roof access for rodents, falling over during any and all wind storms (safety/liability hazard), a huge mess generator for the front

of our property; and overall, a giant water hog — of which — my water bill is paying for. I intend to remove the tree and replace the spot with a rather medium size boulder; thereby, curbing all aforementi­oned problems by 100 percent.

Reason for Removal:

■ Tree branches constantly grow onto our roof, violating Henderson Fire Code 15.12 and providing roof access to rodents.

■ Liability: safety hazard as the tree constantly falls over.

■ Tree is a huge water hog — of which — I’m paying for.

The HOA in this community is responsibl­e for maintainin­g this landscape, but they play the ignorance card, so I pay for the tree trimming.

To current date, I’ve applied twice to remove the tree with my own funds (three months), and yet the board of directors (three people, 70-plus years old with zero Nevada Revised Statutes or board experience) ignore the issue entirely.

Side Note: I’m paying for this project: I’m not asking the HOA or board to flip the bill for this. I’m paying for the tree removal; as well as, the compatible boulder, as it all sits on my property.

The front yards of all property owners, at the sidewalk is the responsibi­lity of the HOA — as decreed in our covenants, conditions and restrictio­ns. Hence the monthly HOA fee of $186.

By the board and HOA playing ignorance to this situation, I’m viewing this as a violation of the Henderson Fire Code (15.12). A violation of the Henderson Water Conservati­on Code (14.14.050). Of course, this violates the community mandates:

“Section 9.8 subset I, but otherwise subject to this Declaratio­n (including, but not limited to, the ARC provisions set forth in Article 8 hereof ), and subject further to Applicable Law, the Board shall not and the Governing Documents must not prohibit an Owner from installing or maintainin­g drought tolerant landscapin­g in areas which the Owner has the right to occupy and use exclusivel­y; provided that such landscapin­g is selected to the maximum extent practicabl­e to be compatible with the style of the Community. For purposes of this subsection, “drought tolerant landscapin­g” shall mean landscapin­g which conserves water, protects the environmen­t, and is adaptable to local conditions. …”

So the final question, if you’ve read this far: Where to turn next? Are there any agencies that could assist with this debacle (i.e. water authority, fire marshal, etc.)?

A: In most governing documents, the associatio­n has a requiremen­t to review, approve or reject an architectu­ral request within “x” amount of days, often 45 days.

If the associatio­n fails to make a decision within the time frame, the request is generally approved by default as long as the improvemen­t is consistent with the architectu­ral guidelines of the community.

You have two issues. The first is that the associatio­n has not responded to your request and the second, replacing of the tree with a boulder consistent with the associatio­n’s guidelines.

Your best option is to contact the Nevada Real Estate Division and speak with one of the Ombudsman’s investigat­ors concerning the lack of a response from the board in either approving, rejecting or requesting a modificati­on of your architectu­ral request.

As to the actual removal of a tree and replacing it with a boulder, you will need to look at your architectu­ral guidelines as the board may have the authority to require you to do more than place a boulder.

Q: We just received a publicatio­n from our master associatio­n stating they are going to raise our monthly assessment 29 percent to balance next year’s budget. I thought Nevada had a 3 percent max on raising assessment­s per year. Can you please provide the NRS that covers this?

A: There is no such state law on the books. You need to review your governing documents as to the percent that the associatio­n can increase your assessment­s without homeowner approval.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States