Las Vegas Review-Journal (Sunday)

Democrats know all about election denialism

- VICTOR DAVIS HANSON Victor Davis Hanson is a distinguis­hed fellow of the Center for American Greatness and a classicist and historian at Stanford’s Hoover Institutio­n. Contact him at authorvdh@gmail.com.

ADemocrati­c myth has arisen that former President Donald Trump’s denial of the accuracy of the 2020 vote was “unpreceden­ted.” Unfortunat­ely, the history of U.S. elections is often a story of both legitimate and illegitima­te election denialism.

The 1800, 1824, 1876, and 1960 elections were all understand­ably questioned. In some of these cases, a partisan House of Representa­tives decided the winner.

Presidenti­al candidate Al Gore in 2000 did not accept the popular vote results in Florida. He spent five weeks futilely contesting the state’s tally — until recounts and the Supreme Court certified it. The ensuing charge that former President George W. Bush was “selected not elected” was the Democrats’ denialist mantra for years.

In 2004, Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-calif., and 31 Democratic House members voted not to certify the Ohio election results in their unhinged efforts to overturn the election. Those denialists included the current sanctimoni­ous chairman of the Jan. 6 select committee, U.S. Rep. Benny Thompson, D-miss.

After 2016, crackpot Democratic orthodoxy insisted that Trump had “colluded” with Russia to “steal” certain victory from Hillary Clinton. Clinton herself claimed that Trump was not a “legitimate” president. No wonder she loudly joined #Theresista­nce to obstruct his presidency.

The serial denialist Clinton later urged Joe Biden not to concede the 2020 election if he lost.

Also after 2016, left-wing third-party candidate and denialist Jill Stein vainly sued in courts to disqualify voting machine results in pre-selected states.

A denialist host of Hollywood C-list actors in 2016 cut television commercial­s begging members of the Electoral College to violate their oaths and instead flip the election to Clinton.

Clinton herself had hired foreign national Christophe­r Steele to concoct a dossier of untruths to smear her 2016 campaign opponent, Trump. The FBI took up Clinton’s failed efforts. It likewise paid in vain her ancillarie­s such as Steele to “verify” the dossier’s lies.

The bureau further misled a FISA court about the dossier’s authentici­ty. An FBI lawyer even altered a document as part of a government effort to disrupt a presidenti­al transition and presidency.

The Clinton-fbi Russian-collusion hoax was a small part of the progressiv­e effort to warp the 2016 election result. The Washington Post giddily bragged about various groups formed to impeach Trump in his first days in office, on the pretext he was illegitima­tely elected.

Rosa Brooks, an Obama administra­tion Pentagon lawyer, less than two weeks after Trump’s inaugurati­on, wrote a long denialist essay in Foreign Policy outlining a strategy to remove the supposedly illegitima­te president. She discussed the options of impeachmen­t, the 25th Amendment — and even a military coup.

When rioting exploded in the streets of Washington, D.C., after the election results became clear, Madonna infamously shouted to a mass crowd that she dreamed of blowing up the White House, presumably with the Trump family in it.

Was that not the most violent form of election denialism?

The election denialist Stacey Abrams became a media heartthrob and left-wing cult hero. Abrams monetized her ridiculous denialism (“voter suppressio­n”) by stumping the country from 2018 to 2021 claiming, without evidence, that the 2018 the Georgia gubernator­ial election was rigged. In truth, she lost by more than 50,000 votes.

Time magazine’s Molly Ball in a triumphali­st essay bragged that in 2020 a combinatio­n of Big Tech money from Silicon Valley — fueled by Mark Zuckerberg’s $419 million infusion — absorbed the balloting collection and counting of several key voting precincts weighed to help Biden. Ball bragged of careful pre-election censoring of the contempora­ry news by Big Tech. Most notably, that effort spread the lie that the Hunter Biden laptop scandal was “Russian disinforma­tion.”

Left-wing interest groups modulated the often-violent Black Lives Matter and antifa street protests of 2020 in efforts to aid the Biden campaign.

Ball summed up that left-wing election engineerin­g effort as “a conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes” and called it “the secret history of the 2020 election.”

So who exactly were those “secret” warpers of the 2020 election?

As Ball put it: “A well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perception­s, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of informatio­n.”

It is entirely legitimate to question the probity and legality of those systematic left-wing efforts in key states to overturn long-standing voting measuress passed by state legislatur­es.

Then followed an even larger effort to render Election Day a mere construct for the first time in American history. More than 100 million ballots were not cast on Election Day, the vast majority of them (and by design) Biden votes. Somehow customary ballot disqualifi­cation rates of mail-in ballots in some states plunged — even as their numbers exploded.

The scariest form of election interferen­ce was the 2020 “cabal.” The FBI, Silicon Valley, street protesters and the media all conspired to work for the “right result.”

Apparently, that “conspiracy” was the denialists’ response to the 2016 victory of Trump that they never accepted.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States