Las Vegas Review-Journal (Sunday)

Wis. Supreme Court control, abortion at stake

Campaign spending likely to double record

- By Scott Bauer

Control of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, and likely the future of abortion access, Republican-drawn legislativ­e maps and years of GOP policies in the key swing state rests with the outcome of an election Tuesday that has seen record campaign spending.

The winner of the high-stakes contest between Republican-backed Dan Kelly and Democratic-supported Janet Protasiewi­cz will determine majority control of the court headed into the 2024 presidenti­al election. The court came within one vote of overturnin­g President Joe Biden’s narrow win in 2020, and both sides expect another close race in 2024.

It’s the latest election where abortion rights has been the central issue since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last June. It’s also an example of how officially nonpartisa­n court races have grown into political battles as major legal fights play out at the state level.

All of it has fueled spending that will double, and likely triple or more, the previous high of $15.4 million spent on a state court race in Illinois in 2004. Democrats have spent heavily for Protasiewi­cz and Republican­s for Kelly.

Democrats are trying to flip control of the court, which has had a

majority of conservati­ve justices the past 15 years. That has allowed the court to uphold an array of Republican priorities, including banning absentee ballot drop boxes last year and affirming the 2011 law all-but ending collective bargaining for most public workers.

“The policy direction of Wisconsin is going to be determined in large part by this Supreme Court race,” said University of Wisconsin-madison political science professor Barry Burden. “Everything from abortion to disputes over the 2024 presidenti­al election are going to land in the

lap of this court. And the winner will be the deciding justice on these issues.”

Protasiewi­cz, 60, has tried to make the race a referendum on abortion, running on a Democratic-backed agenda that includes her loudly voicing her “personal values” in support of abortion rights.

The court is expected to rule on a lawsuit challengin­g the state’s 174-year-old law banning nearly all abortions.

That law, enacted a year after statehood, went back into effect after the Supreme Court’s ruling overturnin­g Roe v. Wade, leading to an end to abortions being provided in Wisconsin. Democrats, including Gov. Tony Evers who won reelection in November, have seized on the issue.

“Abortion was a real motivator for Democrats and independen­ts,” Burden said. “It’s been amped up in this election because the court has a real role in determinin­g the policy.”

Protasiewi­cz won the backing of Planned Parenthood and other similar groups as she focused on abortion without saying how she would rule on the pending case challengin­g the ban. But she’s promised that Kelly would vote to uphold it.

Kelly hasn’t said whether he thinks the ban is legal. But he has expressed opposition to abortion in the past, including in a 2012 blog post in which he said the Democratic Party and the National Organizati­on for Women were committed to normalizin­g the taking of human life.

Kelly also has done legal work for Wisconsin Right to Life, one of three anti-abortion groups that has endorsed him.

Abortion isn’t the only hot political issue Protasiewi­cz has embraced. She also called the Republican-drawn legislativ­e maps upheld by the current court “rigged” and said she would welcome revisiting them.

The state Supreme Court upheld Republican-drawn maps in 2022. Those maps, widely regarded as among the most gerrymande­red in the country..

 ?? Morry Gash
The Associated Press file ?? Wisconsin Supreme Court candidates Republican-backed Dan Kelly and Democratic-supported Janet Protasiewi­cz debate on March 21 in Madison, Wis.
Morry Gash The Associated Press file Wisconsin Supreme Court candidates Republican-backed Dan Kelly and Democratic-supported Janet Protasiewi­cz debate on March 21 in Madison, Wis.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States