Las Vegas Review-Journal (Sunday)

Judge: 1800s vice law affects abortion drug

Mifepristo­ne mailing not permitted in U.S.

- By Matthew Perrone

WASHINGTON — A 19th century “anti-vice” law is at the center of a new court ruling that threatens access to the leading abortion drug in the United States.

Dormant for a half-century, the Comstock Act has been revived by anti-abortion groups and conservati­ve states seeking to block the mailing of mifepristo­ne, the pill used in more than half of U.S. abortions.

On Friday, a federal judge in Texas sided with Christian conservati­ves in ruling that the Comstock Act prohibits sending the long-used drug through the mail.

A look at the case and the law:

In a sweeping ruling, U.S. District Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk said that the Food and Drug Administra­tion’s approval of mifepristo­ne more than two decades ago violated federal rules. Despite overwhelmi­ng evidence to the contrary, the Donald Trump appointee said the FDA overlooked “legitimate safety concerns” with the pill, which has been available since 2000.

The Biden administra­tion and mifepristo­ne’s main drugmaker filed appeals notices within hours of the decision.

The Texas ruling came almost simultaneo­usly with an order from a judge in Washington state, who said the FDA must maintain access to the drug in Democratic-led states that filed their own lawsuit. The dueling opinions are expected to send the matter quickly to the Supreme Court.

A former lawyer for the conservati­ve First Liberty Institute, Kacsmaryk used the terminolog­y of anti-abortion advocates throughout his opinion, referring to doctors who prescribe mifepristo­ne as “abortionis­ts,” fetuses as “unborn humans” and medication abortions as “chemical” abortions.

If upheld, Kacsmaryk’s 67-page decision would also dismantle recent FDA changes designed to ease access to mifepristo­ne, particular­ly a 2021 switch that allowed the drug to be sent through the mail.

Originally passed in 1873 and named for an anti-vice crusader, the Comstock Act was intended to prohibit the mailing of contracept­ives, “lewd” writings and any “instrument, substance, drug, medicine, or thing” that could be used in an abortion.

The law’s scope has been repeatedly narrowed by federal courts and Congress, which eliminated the reference to contracept­ives in the 1970s. And the federal government hasn’t enforced the law since the 1930s, according to legal experts.

Kacsmaryk, though, agreed with plaintiffs that the law — as literally interprete­d — prohibits mailing mifepristo­ne.

The law was essentiall­y dormant in the 50 years after Roe v. Wade establishe­d a federal right to abortion. And until the FDA loosened its requiremen­ts on mifepristo­ne in 2021, there was no real way to enable abortion through the mail.

But Rachel Rebouché of Temple University’s law school says anti-abortion groups — emboldened by the Supreme Court decision overturnin­g of Roe — have seized on Comstock to try and shut off the flow of abortion drugs.

 ?? The Associated Press file ?? Boxes of the drug mifepristo­ne on a shelf at the West Alabama Women’s Center in Tuscaloosa, Ala., in March 2022.
The Associated Press file Boxes of the drug mifepristo­ne on a shelf at the West Alabama Women’s Center in Tuscaloosa, Ala., in March 2022.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States