Las Vegas Review-Journal (Sunday)

Court upholds Ky. legislativ­e boundaries

- By Bruce Schreiner

Kentucky’s Supreme Court on Thursday upheld Republican-drawn boundaries for state House and congressio­nal districts, rejecting Democratic claims that the majority party’s mapmaking amounted to gerrymande­ring in violation of the state’s constituti­on.

The court noted that an alternativ­e proposal would have resulted in nearly the same lopsided advantage for Republican­s in Kentucky House elections and would not have altered the GOP’S 5-1 advantage in U.S. House seats from the Bluegrass State.

The new district boundaries were passed by the Gop-dominated legislatur­e over Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear’s vetoes in early 2022. The new maps were used in last year’s election.

The justices referred to redistrict­ing as an “inherently political process” assigned to the legislatur­e.

“An expectatio­n that apportionm­ent will be free of partisan considerat­ions would thus not only be unrealisti­c, but also inconsiste­nt with our constituti­on’s assignment of responsibi­lity for that process to an elected political body,” Justice Angela Mccormick Bisig wrote in the majority opinion.

The court concluded that the oncea-decade mapmaking did not violate Kentucky’s constituti­on. It upheld a lower court ruling that had concluded the new boundaries amounted to “partisan gerrymande­rs,” but said the constituti­on doesn’t explicitly forbid the considerat­ion of partisan interests during redistrict­ing.

The new maps were challenged by the state Democratic Party and several individual­s, including Democratic state Rep. Derrick Graham. Their lawsuit contended the new boundaries reflected “extreme partisan gerrymande­ring” in violation of the state constituti­on. It claimed the state House map divided some counties into multiple districts to “dilute the influence” of Democratic voters.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States