Las Vegas Review-Journal (Sunday)

An absurd Democrat border con

Desperate Biden tries to turn immigratio­n issue on Republican­s

- VICTOR DAVIS HANSON COMMENTARY Victor Davis Hanson is a distinguis­hed fellow of the Center for American Greatness and a classicist and historian at Stanford’s Hoover Institutio­n. Contact him at authorvdh@gmail.com.

IN 2021, Joe Biden opened wide an inherited, secure southern border that had finally stopped mass illegal immigratio­n. When he overturned Donald Trump’s efforts, a planned flood of more than 8 million illegal immigrants entered the United States.

Almost all arrived without background checks, health screening or vaccinatio­n certificat­es — but with massive needs for free housing, education, health care and food entitlemen­ts and subsidies.

For four years, Trump battled the courts, his Democratic opposition and the open-border establishm­ents within his own party to ensure legal-only immigratio­n. Somehow, he rebuilt some of the old porous border fence. He had begun to build his long-promised new wall to the Gulf of Mexico. He had ended Obama-era catch-and-release.

Would-be refugees had to apply for asylum in their home country. Trump leveraged Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador to police his own border and stop cynically transiting millions of illegal aliens into the United States.

There was general Democratic Party opposition to all of Trump’s measures, both through Congress and via the courts.

For the past three years of Biden’s mass influx, the left has applauded open borders. That is, until late last year, when overwhelme­d southern border state governors began busing and flying illegal immigrants en masse to northern sanctuary-city jurisdicti­ons.

For years, these sanctuary zones had preened their liberality about open borders. They smeared as “racists” and “xenophobes” any who insisted on legal-only immigratio­n. But now they were subject to the real-life ramificati­ons of their own destructiv­e ideologies.

Major blue-state cities such as Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Washington, D.C., became outraged that they were inundated with tens of thousands of immigrants, all without legality, veritable identifica­tion or background checks.

Some proved violent. Others crowded out scarce resources essential to millions of inner-city poor.

The liberal architects of illegal immigratio­n are usually rich and powerful enough to be insulated from the consequenc­es of their utopian policies. But not so their poor or minority constituen­ts. They deal firsthand with spiking crime, appropriat­ion of their parks and civic centers and restricted access to now overwhelme­d social services.

So the once open-border Democrat Party and Joe Biden are in a quandary. They now fear mass defections of core Latino and Black voters in an election year.

But how can they square the circle of insisting on open borders with the need to appear to their own voters as determined to close them? We saw the absurd answer last week. Shameless Democrats tried to enlist naïve and foolish Republican­s to bail them out with a “comprehens­ive immigratio­n bill.”

It was really designed to keep the border open while spending billions of dollars to facilitate more rapid and orderly transits — and more substantia­l welfare support for millions of illegals here and still to come.

Now Democrats, in lunatic fashion, claim that anyone who did not sign on to codify and regulate illegal immigratio­n was responsibl­e for their own deliberate open border policies in the first place!

To add insult to injury, they next sought to piggyback their toxic immigratio­n bill onto massive aid for Israel and Ukraine. It was a transparen­t effort to blame any Republican­s for harming Israel and aiding Putin, should they not sign on to a more efficient open border.

The real agendas of the bill’s supporters were absolutely no return to Trump’s legal-only immigratio­n and a secure border.

That simple solution requires no new legislatio­n and almost no new spending. But it does imply acknowledg­ement that the hated Trump had solved the problem executivel­y — and that admission is apparently taboo.

Finally, public outrage from the left and conservati­ve anger at naïve Republican enablers stopped the bill.

Still, it remains somewhat unclear why Biden and his Homeland Security chief, Alejandro Mayorkas, destroyed what Trump had achieved. Why would they ensure such misery for both American hosts and millions of illegal immigrants?

Did they want new long-term constituen­ts, given that their neo-socialist agendas cannot win over a majority of current Americans? Is importing millions of the poorest and most in need on the planet a way to ensure a still larger Great Society of entitlemen­ts and, with it, higher taxes on the “filthy rich”? Do they assume that America’s increasing­ly non-election Day balloting ensures far less authentica­tion and rejection of mailin ballots, and thus it will be relatively easy for noncitizen­s to vote?

Many, left and right, make no effort to hide their desire for cheap labor — even though the current labor participat­ion rate is only 62 percent of the potential American workforce.

Finally, one might expect this artifice from the left that is wedded to open borders.

But why some establishm­ent Republican­s aided and abetted these disingenuo­us efforts is yet another reminder why the doctrinair­e Republican Party had to be reinvented by Trump.

 ?? ??
 ?? The Associated Press file ??
The Associated Press file

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States