Las Vegas Review-Journal (Sunday)

Water heaters usually responsibi­lity of condo owner

- BARBARA HOLLAND ASSOCIATIO­N Q&A Barbara Holland, CPM, is an author, educator and expert witness on real estate issues pertaining to management and brokerage. Questions may be sent to holland744­o@gmail.com.

Q: I have been the president of a very active and proactive board for some time now. Our developmen­t has 84 units.

Over the past few years we have paved the parking lots, replaced the windows in all of the units, replaced the roofs as well as a number of other assorted projects aimed at enhancing the value for our owners.

We have had instances in the past wherein a water heater would fail in one of the units and infiltrate the adjoining units beside and below it. I recently undertook developing a (project) aimed at replacing all of the water heaters (with some requiremen­ts as to the age of the heaters).

When discussing this with one of the board members, he asked why we simply couldn’t mandate that each owner, based on establishe­d guidelines, be compelled to replace their individual water heaters.

My instinct tells me that this falls outside of our legislativ­e purview but I thought I would ask the expert. Your thoughts?

A: Unless your governing documents state otherwise, hot water heaters are the personal property of the homeowners. Technicall­y, the homeowners are monitoring them and are replacing them when needed, somewhere around seven years, if they are being properly maintained. At 10 years of age, you definitely need to replace your hot water heater.

Your governing documents probably have some language that homeowners are responsibl­e for maintainin­g their units. As to mandating the replacemen­t of hot water heaters while the concept makes much sense, as too often leaking hot water heaters have caused major damages, you would first need to check with your attorney to see if there is some flexibilit­y to pass such a requiremen­t. This change may require an amendment passed by the homeowners.

On an administra­tive side, it would be challengin­g as you would need to keep accurate records as there could be units that are newer and would not need to be replaced.

Q: I am trying find out if you are aware of any associatio­ns who have forgone property and liability coverage?

Our associatio­n in prior years have filed a number of claims resulting in our carrier canceling our policy. Finding a new carrier has been difficult. The two carriers who did provide a quote have monthly premiums that are twice as much as our last carrier. Our community is not positioned to increase fees through assessment increases.

How risky is it to not have insurance and ask the members to increase thier protection individual­ly?

A: Under Nevada Revised Statutes 116.3113, associatio­ns in Nevada are required to maintain, to the extent reasonably available and subject to reasonable deductible, to carry property insurance, commercial general liability, crime insurance, directors and officers insurance. This past legislativ­e session, under Senate Bill 378, associatio­ns have to maintain cyber liability insurance.

I can name at least two associatio­ns where there was no “universal” insurance coverage where homeowners were required to obtain insurance coverages on their homes. In both cases, there were fires that burned down a number of homes that did not have insurance. These associatio­ns soon saw their asking sales price and sales significan­tly drop. The debris from the fires stayed untouched for years and were eyesores at the communitie­s, especially for homeowners whose homes were adjacent to the fire homes. Obtaining mortgages for sales or refinancin­g existing ones became major financial problems for these associatio­ns. It took years before the associatio­ns were made whole.

These associatio­ns required homeowners to obtain insurance but there was no plan set in place for those who did not comply with the regulation. In another case, the associatio­n paid for the individual insurance on homes that did not comply and placed liens on those properties.

You will need the assistance of legal counsel to determine if, legally, the associatio­n can require each homeowner to obtain insurance on their homes. If the associatio­n can mandate this regulation, will the associatio­n be required to reduce the cost for insurance that is included with the annual assessment­s?

For homeowners who have mortgages, their banking institutio­ns will most likely obtain coverage, which will be added to the homeowners’ mortgage payments. For those homeowners without mortgages, the enforcemen­t plan must be set in place.

Other questions for legal counsel would include the borrowing of funds from the reserve account, which would include a repayment plan to the reserves? What requiremen­ts would need to be met if the associatio­n entered into a loan with a bank and a separate insurance assessment would be establishe­d for the monthly loan payment?

In looking for insurance coverages, can your insurance agent for your associatio­n find any companies whereby the associatio­n has reduced coverage, i.e., being partially self-insured, co-insurance policies? This would require the associatio­n to maintain “x” percentage of the value of the community.

Your board may not have too many choices. In any case, expenses will increase.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States