Las Vegas Review-Journal (Sunday)

Independen­t doctors need level playing field

- By Paul Berggreen Special to the Las Vegas Review-journal Dr. Paul Berggreen is board chair and president of the American Independen­t Medical Practice Associatio­n. He is also a gastroente­rologist in Phoenix.

CORPORATE juggernaut­s are coming to dominate the U.S. health care system. Unitedheal­th now employs 10 percent of all physicians in the United States. Hospitals signed up more than 58,000 new physician employees and acquired nearly 5,000 private practices between 2019 and the end of 2021. Amazon and CVS are investing heavily in adding doctors to their payrolls.

The gradual disappeara­nce of independen­t physician practices is not in the best interest of patients. Policymake­rs must ensure that our health care system does not discrimina­te against independen­t practices — and unwittingl­y put them out of business.

The health care market has been slowly consolidat­ing for decades. As of 2021, more than half of doctors worked for hospitals or health systems, according to research by Avalere Health for the Physicians Advocacy Institute. All told, nearly three-quarters of physicians work for corporate entities. Forty years ago, by contrast, roughly three-quarters of physicians worked in their own medical practices.

The causes of this consolidat­ion are many. For hospitals and health systems, moving doctors in-house can boost referrals to other parts of the system — and thereby increase revenue. For doctors leaving private practice, employment can mean steadier pay, a larger corporate infrastruc­ture to offer administra­tive support and new patient referrals.

But independen­t practice offers patients and the health care system many benefits. Patients who receive care at independen­t practices often post better health outcomes. That makes intuitive sense. Independen­t physicians have a strong incentive to build trust and forge relationsh­ips with their patients. Their patients report higher levels of satisfacti­on.

One study from researcher­s at Harvard found that the difference­s in performanc­e between health system-affiliated and non-system physicians were small. But health systems charged much higher prices for physician services — in some cases more than 25 percent more.

Administra­tors of health care behemoths claim that consolidat­ion allows for more efficient and cost-effective treatment for patients. But by buying up their competitor­s, hospitals and health systems have gained the market power to command higher prices. With fewer independen­t practices to foster competitio­n, big health care systems have less incentive to deliver the higher-quality, lower-cost care they promise.

There are ways policymake­rs can ensure the viability of independen­t practices — and bring about a competitiv­e marketplac­e that works to the advantage of patients.

First, Congress can fix the formula Medicare uses to pay doctors. Medicare reimbursem­ent for physician services declined 3.37 percent at the beginning of this year. A new spending bill just signed into law by President Joe Biden offsets a portion of that cut — but that’s not enough. When adjusted for inflation, Medicare reimbursem­ent for physicians has sunk 30 percent since 2001.

Independen­t physicians’ costs haven’t decreased during that period. The cost of running a practice is up nearly 50 percent. But Medicare reimbursem­ent for hospitals have increased with inflation since 2001.

The combinatio­n of pay cuts, increased costs and Medicare’s structural bias in favor of hospitals makes it harder for independen­t physicians to compete. Independen­t doctors deserve a level playing field.

Congress has blunted cuts to Medicare reimbursem­ent in each of the past four years. But a pay cut is still a pay cut. An annual band-aid is insufficie­nt. A longer-term solution is needed. Some lawmakers recognize as much.

This year, six senators — three Republican­s and three Democrats, including Nevada Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto — announced that they would work on legislatio­n that would “make changes to the current Medicare physician payment system to ensure financial stability for providers, improve patient outcomes, promote access to quality care and incentiviz­e the utilizatio­n of emerging health care technology.” We support these objectives.

In the House, a bipartisan group of 82 members has endorsed a measure that would index physician pay under Medicare to inflation.

Approaches such as these would help ensure that independen­t physician practices can continue to provide the high-quality, cost-efficient care patients are looking for — and push back against the broader consolidat­ion trend that has taken hold in the market.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States