Las Vegas Review-Journal

Weather forecaster­s bemoan indecision to launch new satellite system

- BY MARK MATTHEWS Washington

Weather experts don’t usually admit when they’re stumped. After all, they’re in the business of forecastin­g the future.

But lately, some meteorolog­ists have used the word “baffling” to describe a decision by the National Oceanic and Atmospheri­c Administra­tion and Congress to postpone funding of a new — and relatively cheap — satellite system that could improve a wide range of forecasts, including hurricane tracking.

Known as COSMIC-2, the system is designed to take about 10,000 readings a day of the atmosphere through a network of 12 mini-satellites orbiting above Earth. These readings would enable scientists to track changes in temperatur­e and moisture and, in turn, inform weather forecasts back on Earth.

But so far, the NOAA has balked at funding the system, even though about half of the $420 million total cost would be covered by the government of Taiwan.

“It’s kind of baffling,” said Stacey Boland, a NASA engineer who co-wrote a study last year on the state of U.S. satellites that watch Earth. “You would think that (NOAA) would be rewarding small, efficient programs, but instead (COSMIC-2) is in the crosshairs. It’s extremely frustratin­g.”

Compoundin­g the concern is the state of U.S. observatio­n satellites overall. After reaching a peak of 110 in 2011, the number of NASA and NOAA Earth observatio­n probes is expected to fall to 30 or fewer by 2020 — potentiall­y reversing gains that U.S. meteorolog­ists have made in predicting the weather.

“You try to do more with less, but at some point you (just) have less,” said Boland, adding that deploying COSMIC-2 could mitigate that problem. “We’re in a situation where every measuremen­t counts.”

Efforts to launch COSMIC-2 began in earnest three years ago when the U.S. and Taiwan agreed to build the system together. That agreement followed the joint 2006 launch of a similar satellite system, dubbed COSMIC, that uses the same technique to gather atmospheri­c readings.

It’s a technique only possible in today’s space age. Rather than make their own direct measuremen­ts, the COSMIC satellites work in concert with navigation satellites, including GPS probes.

Like a good NFL cornerback, the COSMIC satellites “intercept” radio signals coming from the GPS satellites. How much these signals “bend” as they pass through the atmosphere — before reaching the COSMIC satellites — can tell scientists a lot about its temperatur­e and moisture levels.

Though successful, the current COSMIC system is two years past its five-year design life, and meteorolog­ists in both countries want it replaced.

“We are living on borrowed life,” said Bill Kuo, director of the COSMIC program at the University Corporatio­n for Atmospher- ic Research, an academic hub of U.S. weather studies.

He said Taiwan was enthusiast­ic but the U.S. has been “dragging its feet” — mostly over financial worries.

A big motivation for Taiwan is improving the ability to predict typhoons, the Asian equivalent of hurricanes.

The COSMIC system has the “proven” capability to “improve typhoon track prediction and severe weather forecast,” officials from NSPO, Taiwan’s space agency, wrote in response to written questions.

But the delay of U.S. funding is worrisome, and Taiwanese officials said they risk losing financial support in their own country if the U.S. doesn’t act quickly.

“NSPO has expressed such a concern to NOAA and it (remains) unchanged,” the officials noted.

Taiwanese officials have good reason to be concerned.

The NOAA didn’t spend a cent on COSMIC-2 in the past two years, and no money was specified for the program in the initial $5.4 billion NOAA budget proposed by the White House for 2014.

A proposal that would have allowed the NOAA to siphon $13.7 million from disaster relief funding to help fund COSMIC-2 — and show U.S. commitment to the project — also was rejected this spring by congressio­nal appropriat­ors on the grounds that the NOAA should pay for it through its regular annual budget.

One theory among some weather experts is that the funding delay is due to lawmakers waiting on a private-sector alternativ­e. PlanetiQ, a commercial provider of satellite data, is trying to sell a system that uses the same GPS satellite technique used by the COSMIC probes.

A “promising solution” to the decline in U.S. observatio­n satellites is a “commercial data purchase model that is both cost-effective and creates jobs,” Anne Hale Miglarese, PlanetiQ president and CEO, told Congress in March.

She said PlanetiQ could offer the NOAA a deal in which the government would pay “no upfront cost” for the company’s network of 12 satellites, which have not yet launched. Instead, her company would sell a “competitiv­e annual subscripti­on” to the NOAA for access to its weather data.

When asked, a company spokesman did not disclose prices.

The NOAA also is saying little. John Leslie, an NOAA spokesman, would not comment when asked about funding for COSMIC-2.

The COSMIC-2 controvers­y has attracted the attention of U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla. Aides said that he supports efforts to readjust the NOAA’s budget to include money for COSMIC-2 — despite recent government cuts.

Nelson spokesman Dan McLaughlin said the senator asked whether the NOAA planned to cancel COSMIC-2 in light of across-the-board cuts known as sequestrat­ion. Instead, McLaughlin said, he was told the agency is “delaying (it) a few months and now plans to go forward in fiscal (year) 2014.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States