Las Vegas Review-Journal

Murderer’s execution lasts nearly two hours

-

FLORENCE, Ariz. — A condemned Arizona inmate gasped and snorted for more than an hour and a half during his execution Wednesday before he died in an episode sure to add to the scrutiny surroundin­g the death penalty in the U.S.

Arizona Attorney General Tom Horne’s office said Joseph Rudolph Wood was pronounced dead at 3:49 p.m., one hour and 57 minutes after the execution started. Gov. Jan Brewer said she is ordering a full review of the state’s execution process, saying she’s concerned by how long it took for the administer­ed drug protocol to kill Wood.

Wood’s lawyers had filed an emergency appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court while the execution was underway, demanding that it be stopped. The appeal said Wood was “gasping and snorting for more than an hour.”

Word that Justice Anthony Kennedy denied the appeal came about a half hour after Wood’s death.

Wood, 55, gasped more than 600 times before he died. Defense lawyer Dale Baich called it a botched execution that should have taken 10 minutes.

Family members of the victims said they had no problems with the way the execution was carried out.

“This man conducted a horrific murder and you guys are going, let’s worry about the drugs,” Richard Brown said.

Wood looked at the family members as he delivered his final words, saying he was thankful for Jesus Christ as his savior. At one point, he smiled at them, which angered the family.

“I take comfort knowing today my pain stops, and I said a prayer that on this or any other day you may find peace in all of your hearts and may God forgive you all,” Wood said.

The case has highlighte­d scrutiny surroundin­g lethal injections after two controvers­ial executions, including that of an Ohio inmate in January who snorted and gasped during the 26 minutes it took him to die.

In Oklahoma, an inmate died of a heart

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

attack minutes after prison officials halted his execution because the drugs weren’t being administer­ed properly.

Arizona uses the same drugs, the sedative midazolam and painkiller hydromorph­one, that were used in the Ohio execution. A different drug combinatio­n was used in the Oklahoma case.

States have refused to reveal details such as which pharmacies are supplying lethal injection drugs and who is administer­ing them, because of concerns over harassment.

Woods filed several appeals that were denied by the U.S. Supreme Court, including one that said his First Amendment rights were violated when the state refused to reveal details such as the supplier of the drugs.

The Arizona Supreme Court also delayed the execution Wednesday morning to consider a last-minute appeal about whether Wood received inadequate legal representa­tion at his sentencing. About an hour later, the state’s high court allowed the execution to proceed.

Wood argued he has a First Amendment right to details about the state’s method for lethal injections, the qualificat­ions of the executione­r and who makes the drugs. Such demands for greater transparen­cy have become a new legal tactic in death penalty cases.

Wood’s execution was Arizona’s third since October and 36th since 1992.

He was convicted in the 1989 shooting deaths of Debbie Dietz, 29, and Gene Dietz, 55, at an auto repair shop in Tucson.

 ?? THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? John Zemblidge, right, of Phoenix leads a dozen death penalty opponents in prayer Wednesday as they protest the execution of Joseph Rudolph Wood in Florence, Ariz. Wood, 55, killed his ex-girlfriend and her father in 1989 at an auto body shop in Tucson.
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS John Zemblidge, right, of Phoenix leads a dozen death penalty opponents in prayer Wednesday as they protest the execution of Joseph Rudolph Wood in Florence, Ariz. Wood, 55, killed his ex-girlfriend and her father in 1989 at an auto body shop in Tucson.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States