Uber brings pressure over licensing of drivers
Uber cranked up its public relations machine, urging drivers and customers to tell commissioners “to bring Uber to McCarran Airport.”
Uber offered a sample email or letter:
“I am one of the tens of thousands of riders in the Las Vegas community who depends on Uber to get around,” the letter says. “Unfortunately, I can’t get an Uber ride to or from McCarran Airport. This safe, reliable, and affordable transportation option shouldn’t be caught up in politics. I’ve come to depend on Uber in Southern Nevada and my ability to get to and from the airport shouldn’t be an exception. Please allow Uber at the airport.”
Uber also enlisted a powerful ally, the Consumer Technology Association, operators of the giant International Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas every January. CES then issued a statement critical of the county.
“We are disappointed that the Clark County Commission is making it difficult to access ridesharing services on the Las Vegas Strip and at McCarran Airport,” the association’s statement says. “A vibrant array of convenient transportation options is a key element of Las Vegas’ success as aworld-class tourismdestination.
“Given that Nevada law allows for ride-sharing services throughout the state, we urge the Clark County Commission to enable ride-sharing services to operate effectively in Las Vegas. The people of Las Vegas and the city’s more than 40 million annual visitors deserve to have reasonable access to the transportation options that they use in other world-class cities.”
Airport officials say access to McCarran has never been an issue, noting that Lyft has been operating there since Oct. 26.
At the Nov. 17 commission hearing, Uber officials expressed concern that McCarran’s geofencing system, which monitors transportation network companies and calculates fees, would not be able to handle the high number of drivers Uber expects to have.
But some critics say that’s a smokescreen — Uber is trying to prevent the county from getting a list of contracted drivers the company considers proprietary information. The county wants a list of driver names or numbers ensure all payup.Ubercontendsthecountydoesn’t need it.
Dave Sutton, a spokesman for the adversarial “Who’s Driving You?” public awareness campaign sponsored by the national Taxicab, Limousine and Paratransit Association, said the licensing and identification of ride-hailing drivers is an important consumer protection.
“Uberdriverimpostorshavereportedly kidnapped,rapedandrobbedpassengers,” Suttonsaidafterthecommissionapproved the ordinances. “Requiring Uber drivers to get business licenses will help prevent crime by impostors. The more readily enforcement authorities and police can identify real Uber drivers, the easier they can catch dangerous fakes.”
Attorney General Adam Laxalt also is monitoring the county’s ride-hailing situation.
“IamawareofClarkCounty’sproposed ordinanceandunderstandthatitsconstitutionality maybeatissue,” Laxalt said in a statement last week.
“Whenapartychallengestheconstitutionality of a statute or an ordinance, the attorney general is entitled to be heard on the questions presented in that lawsuit,” hesaid.“Inthisinstance,alawsuithasnot yet been filed, but my office will continue to monitor the situation.”
Meanwhile, the Nevada Taxicab Authority has scheduled a Dec. 18 workshop to review new regulations letting taxi drivers lease cabs to become more competitivewithtransportationnetwork companies.
Proponentssaygivingdriverstheability to use cabs for a flat fee would give them more flexibility in scheduling and allow themtokeepmostoftherevenuecollected in fares. Leasing was authorized by state lawmakers in June and takes effect Jan. 1. — Follow @RickVelotta on Twitter. Contact reporter Richard N. Velotta at rvelotta@reviewjournal.com or 702-477-3893.