PROTESTERS
in either case. Both sides, however, acknowledge that when the Supreme Court makes a final decision, it will impact the fate of similar legislation under consideration in at least 18 other states.
SB302 allows parents who pull their children out of public school to tap about $5,100 in state per-pupil funding to help pay for private school tuition or home-school, tutoring and other educational services. Proponents like Hainley — who vastly outnumbered opponents at Friday’s rallies — argue the voucher-style program grants families more options to meet the unique needs of their students.
Taliyah Wilson, 14, said she wants to leave Cheyenne High School to attend Word of Life Christian Academy.
“It means a lot to her,” Wilson’s mother Chappelle White said. “It’s a big opportunity to her.”
Opponents, meanwhile, claim that SB302 will drain resources away from an underfunded public education system and funnel taxpayer money into religious schools.
“I am proof that education is the greatest equalizer,” Assemblywoman Olivia Diaz told fellow opponents, noting that she grew up in a “gang-infested” neighborhood on the city’s east side, where public schools “gave me a chance at life.”
“Every child deserves a quality ed- ucation regardless of zip code,” Diaz said.
Teacher Adam Berger told fellow ESA opponents that the program “amounts to tax cuts for those wealthy enough who can afford it” as the crowd began chanting, “Public choice! Public money!”
As the proceedings began, hundreds trickled inside the Regional Justice Center, crowding security lines at the courthouse’s front doors. They filled an overflow room where the arguments were streamed on two television screens — some had to stand because room was so scarce.
Both sides said they felt optimistic about Friday’s hearing, each hopeful that justices will pick their side.
“I felt like things went very well on both cases,” said ESA supporter Kris Schneider, a principal at Mountain View Lutheran Church & School. “The hardest part now is to wait.”
ESA opponent Sylvia Lazos, who serves as policy director at Educate Nevada Now — a program launched by The Rogers Foundation to advocate for improving public education — shared similar sentiments and said justices “focused on the kinds of things that we want them to focus on.”
“I think they were very receptive to the arguments that we made,” Lazos said. “We did our level best, and I think the judges were very, very attentive and they did their homework. They were focusing on the right issues, and I think they’ll do their level best, too.” Contact Ana Ley at aley@reviewjournal.com or 702-2245512. Find @la__ley on Twitter.